Re: [css-d] Multiple, evenly split, fluid columns inside fixed-width parent container?

Hi Philip, 1) The odd word grouping is down to whitespace rules on links. I've always found it disconcerting reading when links run across a line break, but perhaps I need to take care to keep them short if I'm going to force continuity. 2) The experience is a far longer section than the proficie

Re: [css-d] Multiple, evenly split, fluid columns inside fixed-width parent container?

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:25 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Whoops. My bad! No worries! :) > The article on CSS tables by Georg Sortun is on this page: > > and an demo that accompanies that article is here: >

Re: [css-d] Multiple, evenly split, fluid columns inside fixed-width parent container?

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: Hi David! Thanks for the reply and help, I really appreciate it. :) Ack, did I miss info on tables via that article? I did a quick search: Micky Whoops. My bad! The article on CSS tables by Georg Sortun is on this page:

Re: [css-d] Multiple, evenly split, fluid columns inside fixed-width parent container?

Micky Hulse wrote: Hi Barney! Thanks again for your help! It's much appreciated. Oh, I really dig your site! Very clean and fresh looking. The page transition is really cool and I love your link style on hover. You have an impressive sense of design. :D Additionally, I really dig the f

Re: [css-d] Multiple, evenly split, fluid columns inside fixed-width parent container?

Hi David! Thanks for the reply and help, I really appreciate it. :) On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM, David Laakso wrote: > You might consider using a CSS Table. Its not a table in the > traditional sense... but looks and behaves like one. The columns can > be both equal height and width and will

Re: [css-d] Multiple, evenly split, fluid columns inside fixed-width parent container?

Hi Barney! Thanks again for your help! It's much appreciated. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Barney Carroll wrote: > I always forget that a reply on this list won't reply to the list. Sorry. As Oh, no worries! I do that sometimes also. :D > for margins with columns, I think the best idea is t

[css-d] Off-topic : how old does DW have to be in order to be incompatible with Windows 7 ?

na...@thesmudge.com wrote: older versions of, for example, DreamWeaver, do not run on Vista or 7 How old ? I run V8.0.2 very successfully under Windows 7. Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://ww

Re: [css-d] Internet Explorer

>> I know that in some cases this not possible, but if someone reports >> issues with IE, I'd politely ask whether they have tried late versions >> of Firefox or Chrome :-) >> > > Yes but Ie8 is still widely used in XP systems and about 48% of the people > are still using XPs. It is not easy to ig

Re: [css-d] weird rendering issue in a few versions of IE

Sacha Moufarrege wrote: Perhaps, but most of those are things like missing alt tags that generally shouldn't cause this sort of problem. /Some/ of those are things like missing alt tags, which will render your page inaccessible to the blind and partially sighted; many are not, and just a sin

Re: [css-d] weird rendering issue in a few versions of IE

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:55 AM, David Postill wrote: > > > http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcssd.sigil93.net%2Fcategory%2F-analysis%2F > The 98 errors probably don't help ... > -- > David Postill > Dance your Life - Biodanza in Holland - >

Re: [css-d] weird rendering issue in a few versions of IE

On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:22:21 -0700, Sacha Moufarrege wrote: | Hi All, | | I've inherited a project that involves modifying a pre-existing template to | specifications. A bowdlerized form of the current site can be found here: | | http://cssd.sigil93.net/ | | As you can see, it's in need of work

[css-d] weird rendering issue in a few versions of IE

Hi All, I've inherited a project that involves modifying a pre-existing template to specifications. A bowdlerized form of the current site can be found here: http://cssd.sigil93.net/ As you can see, it's in need of work and the original template wasn't exactly coded according to best practices.