Le 5 juil. 2012 à 04:23, Ingo Chao a écrit :
> According to the CSS3 spec http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/
> @media all { … }
> @media { … }
> should be equivalent.
>
> Current Firefox and Opera agree, and at least Webkit nightly too.
>
> But current Safari, IE9 and IE 10 disagree, only
According to the CSS3 spec http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/
@media all { … }
@media { … }
should be equivalent.
Current Firefox and Opera agree, and at least Webkit nightly too.
But current Safari, IE9 and IE 10 disagree, only the first one applies.
http://satzansatz.de/w3/media.html
My
Hi
Behaviour is expected. Floated and absolutely positioned elements lose
their 100% width by default. See http://jsfiddle.net/6De85/6/ for example.
You should specify the width for selected elements rather than using
general width for positioned elements.
Ville
2012/7/4 muhle...@gmail.com
>
Hi everybody,
We are used to the width of block elements being 100% by default.
HTML5 new 'divs' such as section, article, footer, etc seem to behave
like that when declared as 'display: block;'
This corresponds with Eric's reset.css.
The odd behaviour, in my eyes, is that as soon as you use 'pos
On 04/07/2012 03:25, David Laakso wrote:> I've no idea about that
site, but the official Android SDK includes an
>
> If accuracy is your bag in the end you'll want to break down and
> purchase a mobile device and save the receipt for your business
> accountant.
I think in the end you'll want s
Is it possible that the fonts that your CSS specifies
(especially those classed as "!important") exist on
PCs but not on Apple Macintoshii ?
Philip Taylor
S Baily-Gould wrote:
Sorry, Theresa from the CSS list pointed out that you have to log in to
Hubspot to help. The same page is alrea
