On 7/31/12 8:16 PM, J.C. Berry wrote:
Hi everyone, I have a layout that has three columns with two of them of
varying heights, i.e. one is taller than the other. I need to have a 1
pixel border extend to the height of the taller of the two columns. Any
directions or tutorials would be welcome. I
2012-08-01 4:38, John wrote:
Given this code:
table, th, td{
border:1px dotted black;
border-collapse:collapse;
}
I find that when I use colspan="x", some of the borders are solid as a result,
perhaps because they're doubled up as cells are widened by colspan.
1px dotted bor
2012-08-01 4:16, Georg wrote:
On 01.08.2012 00:14, Tedd Sperling wrote:
This works for me, my students, and W3C validation:
---
Since that only contains an HTML5 "standards mode" trigger (for better
than v.5.5 CSS support in IE/win *) and no DTD to check markup variant
agai
On 7/31/2012 11:16 PM, J.C. Berry wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a layout that has three columns with two of them of varying
heights, i.e. one is taller than the other. I need to have a 1 pixel border
extend to the height of the taller of the two columns. Any directions or
tutorials would be welcome
Hi everyone,
I have a layout that has three columns with two of them of varying
heights, i.e. one is taller than the other. I need to have a 1 pixel border
extend to the height of the taller of the two columns. Any directions or
tutorials would be welcome. I would like to also learn this as compar
On 01.08.2012 03:37, Alan Gresley wrote:
I would most certainly need a reduced test case. I remember your
multi-layer templates from the past. I did have a look and a play
around and I also checked the latest spec [1] and saw the below words.
I not even sure if IE9 is doing it wrong.
Well Ala
Given this code:
table, th, td{
border:1px dotted black;
border-collapse:collapse;
}
I find that when I use colspan="x", some of the borders are solid as a result,
perhaps because they're doubled up as cells are widened by colspan.
Is there a way around this, such that all th
On 31/07/2012 5:34 PM, Georg wrote:
Apparently not.
Georg
I would most certainly need a reduced test case. I remember your
multi-layer templates from the past. I did have a look and a play around
and I also checked the latest spec [1] and saw the below words. I not
even sure if IE
On 01.08.2012 00:14, Tedd Sperling wrote:
This works for me, my students, and W3C validation:
---
Since that only contains an HTML5 "standards mode" trigger (for better
than v.5.5 CSS support in IE/win *) and no DTD to check markup variant
against, it might be interes
On Jul 31, 2012, at 4:18 PM, John D wrote:
>> What html dtd is recommended to reach the most users? HTML 4.01
>> Transitional -- and CSS2?
This works for me, my students, and W3C validation:
---
Your title
---
Cheers,
tedd
_
Has anyone ever experienced problems with names within code using TW on OS X?
I just had a case where I created something for which there's a right and a
left part of a food menu. I did the left part, duped the markup and CSS,
changed all relevant things which were "left" to "right" and the mark
> What html dtd is recommended to reach the most users? HTML 4.01
> Transitional -- and CSS2?
>
I use this as my starting point for all my pages these days:
Untitled 1
Good luck.
How about using terms like (small, x-small, xx-small, medium, large,
x-large or xx-large). Can it be an alternative to % ?
Thanks
Hakan Kirkan
Dominor LLC/ Miami
http://dominor.com
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:06 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
> Taking Richard Rutter's original idea to make the base
2012-07-31 21:04, Josh Rehman wrote:
Well, I honestly don't understand where you see an ambiguity. So,
you're either using physical units like cm or mm or pixels, in which
case you're using an angular measure.
No, in situations where "these dimensions" (all so-called absolute
length units, in
Hi!
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Pro help? Where? ;-)
Pro, and modest too! :D
> Here's an example of the code from the head of the document I usually
> start from:
Awesome! Thanks Tom, that's very helpful :)
This will keep me busy for the next few days (at leas
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> 2012-07-31 20:43, Josh Rehman wrote:
>
>>> The reality is different from the spec, as one can see from the
>>> discussion of the topic in the relevant CSS3 draft:
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#absolute-lengths
>>> The px unit may
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Dave Solko wrote:
> I have a 1px tool line at the bottom of a div. Is it possible to make a
> narrow drop shadow using 'box-shadow'? Everything I've been able to come up
> with is the height of the div. Ideally, I'd like something about 5px tall
> with the blur
2012-07-31 20:43, Josh Rehman wrote:
The reality is different from the spec, as one can see from the discussion of
the topic in the relevant CSS3 draft:
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#absolute-lengths
The px unit may relate to the so-called reference pixel, or it may be anchored to a
physic
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>
> 2012-07-31 3:32, Josh Rehman wrote:
>
>> The screen resolution thing is a non-issue because the CSS px
>> is defined to be an angular measure:
>
>
> The reality is different from the spec, as one can see from the discussion of
> the to
I have a 1px tool line at the bottom of a div. Is it possible to make a narrow
drop shadow using 'box-shadow'? Everything I've been able to come up with is
the height of the div. Ideally, I'd like something about 5px tall with the blur.
TIA
Dave Solko
Pixel Alchemy
d...@pixelalchemy.com
513.30
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Micky Hulse
wrote:
> Thanks a bunch Tom, that's very helpful info. I really appreciate the
> pro help! :)
>
> I'm going to play with workflow ideas you mention.
>
> I'll probably be back with more questions... For now, have a nice night.
>
> Cheers,
> Micky
Pro
On 31.07.2012 10:59, Gergely Buday wrote:
What html dtd is recommended to reach the most users? HTML 4.01
Transitional -- and CSS2?
Markup: the Stricter the better. Markup in accordance with HTML 4.01
Strict works fine in around 99.99% of browsers _in use_ today.
HTML5 using new elements may
Hi there,
this is not strictly a css question but closely related.
What html dtd is recommended to reach the most users? HTML 4.01
Transitional -- and CSS2?
- Gergely
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-d
Apparently not.
Georg
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
S
2012-07-31 3:32, Josh Rehman wrote:
The screen resolution thing is a non-issue because the CSS px
is defined to be an angular measure:
The reality is different from the spec, as one can see from the
discussion of the topic in the relevant CSS3 draft:
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#absolut
25 matches
Mail list logo
