On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh <
sandy.pittendr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good Bradfrost link above. Thank you for that.
>
> Here's a question. Since the great CSS Positioning leap forward we no
> longer have to use nested tables for overall page layoutas did most of
>
At 13:50 -0500 2/1/13, John Snippe wrote:
Wow... nobody is immune from spam, eh?
Sadly not-- mailing lists are vulnerable to anyone who's a
registered member, whether because a spammer signs up an address to
spam intentionally, or a list member's computer or webmail account
gets compromi
Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh wrote:
> Violent prejudice against tables for layout is similar, in a way, to the
> way C-programmers now rail against the infamous goto statement, which is
> sometimes (break out of a doubly nested loop) useful and not
> harmful.if kept under control, and i
Good Bradfrost link above. Thank you for that.
Here's a question. Since the great CSS Positioning leap forward we no
longer have to use nested tables for overall page layoutas did most of
us during the late 1990s.
But I do occasionally (still) use tables for laying out forms. As long as
the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Chris Williams wrote:
> With a hat tip to Phillipe, I've just started building off this model, and
> I love it. Nice responsive form shown in the "form with left labels"
> example.
>
> http://bradfrost.github.com/this-is-responsive/patterns.html
>
> I had been do