Re: [css-d] Form layout patterns

2013-02-05 Thread Tom Livingston
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh < sandy.pittendr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good Bradfrost link above. Thank you for that. > > Here's a question. Since the great CSS Positioning leap forward we no > longer have to use nested tables for overall page layoutas did most of >

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: Hey!

2013-02-05 Thread Eric A. Meyer
At 13:50 -0500 2/1/13, John Snippe wrote: Wow... nobody is immune from spam, eh? Sadly not-- mailing lists are vulnerable to anyone who's a registered member, whether because a spammer signs up an address to spam intentionally, or a list member's computer or webmail account gets compromi

Re: [css-d] Form layout patterns

2013-02-05 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh wrote: > Violent prejudice against tables for layout is similar, in a way, to the > way C-programmers now rail against the infamous goto statement, which is > sometimes (break out of a doubly nested loop) useful and not > harmful.if kept under control, and i

Re: [css-d] Form layout patterns

2013-02-05 Thread Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
Good Bradfrost link above. Thank you for that. Here's a question. Since the great CSS Positioning leap forward we no longer have to use nested tables for overall page layoutas did most of us during the late 1990s. But I do occasionally (still) use tables for laying out forms. As long as the

Re: [css-d] Form layout patterns

2013-02-05 Thread Tom Livingston
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Chris Williams wrote: > With a hat tip to Phillipe, I've just started building off this model, and > I love it. Nice responsive form shown in the "form with left labels" > example. > > http://bradfrost.github.com/this-is-responsive/patterns.html > > I had been do