Re: [css-d] CSS menu at 320px -- meta offtopic

2014-04-29 Thread MiB
apr 27 2014 18:34 Tom Livingston : > Perhaps I'm using "list" in a more general term. Someone *on* the list > has been compromised. And you are correct, it is difficult to figure > out where it's coming from. My main point was that I don't get these > messages outside of this list. While the me

Re: [css-d] Firefox and page inflation -- late response

2014-04-29 Thread MiB
29 apr 2014 kl. 18:35 skrev Tom Livingston : > I recall seeing this come through, I thought so to but couldn’t find it my mailbox nor in the online archive. > but anyway, I'd like to say that I wasn't defending *not* using RWD, I'm a > big proponent of it, but IIRC there were some replies that

Re: [css-d] CSS menu at 320px

2014-04-29 Thread Tim Dawson
On 27/04/2014 04:45, John wrote: I'm having trouble seeing what I'm doing, in a manner of speaking, at 320px. FF will show me most of what's happening with the responsive view, but since I'm working on a desktop, I still have "hover" behavior, plus there seems to be something in the way of sel

Re: [css-d] Firefox and page inflation -- late response

2014-04-29 Thread Tom Livingston
I recall seeing this come through, but anyway, I'd like to say that I wasn't defending *not* using RWD, I'm a big proponent of it, but IIRC there were some replies that eluded to non-responsive sites being "broken" or preventative of users using the site on phones or tablets. I was just saying t