On Monday, June 23, 2014, Jon Reece wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh >
> wrote:
>
> > Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:05, Tom Livingston >
> a écrit :
> >
> > > We found an errant z-index which was putting the content
> > > behind the blue background wrapper. :-P
> >
> >
> > L
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh
wrote:
> Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:05, Tom Livingston a écrit :
>
> > We found an errant z-index which was putting the content
> > behind the blue background wrapper. :-P
>
>
> Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:08, Norman Fournier a
> écrit :
>
> > ...in that
On Monday, June 23, 2014, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:05, Tom Livingston >
> a écrit :
>
> > We found an errant z-index which was putting the content
> > behind the blue background wrapper. :-P
>
>
> Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:08, Norman Fournier > a écrit :
>
> > ...in that c
Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:05, Tom Livingston a écrit :
> We found an errant z-index which was putting the content
> behind the blue background wrapper. :-P
Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:08, Norman Fournier a écrit :
> ...in that case it is interesting to see which browsers rendered that z-index
> propert
On Monday, June 23, 2014, Rick Gordon wrote:
> I didn't search too deeply, but I suspect it's because the element
> is classed as js, and there are a significant number of styles in the CSS
> that are like this:
>
> .js .inner{background:#1d335c;left:0;width:175%}
>
> This is a commonly used app
I didn't search too deeply, but I suspect it's because the
element is classed as js, and there are a significant number of styles
in the CSS that are like this:
.js .inner{background:#1d335c;left:0;width:175%}
This is a commonly used approach, in which is initially classed
as .no-js, and th
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Norman Fournier
wrote:
> ...in that case it is interesting to see which browsers rendered that z-index
> property correctly...
>
Agreed. I don't understand why any browser showed any content at all.
The selector needed JS to be active, but I tried my browser with
...in that case it is interesting to see which browsers rendered that z-index
property correctly...
On 2014-06-23, at 1:05 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Solved.
>
> Thanks all. We found an errant z-index which was putting the content
> behind the blue background wrapper. :-P
>
> On Mon, Jun 23,
Solved.
Thanks all. We found an errant z-index which was putting the content
behind the blue background wrapper. :-P
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Hahnel, Fred (DET-MRM)
wrote:
> That screen flashes then the normal page renders on my Chrome 35.0.1916.153
> on a laptop
>
> -Original Mes
That screen flashes then the normal page renders on my Chrome 35.0.1916.153 on
a laptop
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tom Livingston
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 2:43 PM
To: CSS Discussion Group
Subj
10 matches
Mail list logo