Hi all,
Take a look at my example: http://jsfiddle.net/nn2N7/
In summary I have 2 siblings, one with 100px height and another with 100%. I
was expecting the 100% div to only fill the available space after subtracting
the 100px. Instead it assumes 100% height of parent block level element whic
Le 1 juil. 2014 à 20:57, Lixo Aqui a écrit :
> Take a look at my example: http://jsfiddle.net/nn2N7/
>
> In summary I have 2 siblings, one with 100px height and another with 100%. I
> was expecting the 100% div to only fill the available space after subtracting
> the 100px. Instead it assumes
Thanks for the clarification.
I'm just learning about the flex box module, do you think you can provide an
example of a solution using flexbox?
Because my fix only works if my first sibling has a fixed height which is not
always the case so what I want is 1 children to take as much height as
Maybe if I ask this question a different way, I can figure out an answer.
Normally when I create a table I apply no CSS to it and it just does
the right thing, e.g.:
http://jsfiddle.net/u6ULk/
But I want the table to be scrollable with a fixed header, so I do this:
http://jsfiddle.net/mrLVG/
>
>
> Is it possible to have a scrolling table with fixed headers without
> explicitly specifying the table cell sizes?
>
Depending on your content this may be (or outright is) semantically
horrifying, but you could achieve the *visual look* you want by using
CSS display:table, et al and/or dl,dt,d
Le 1 juil. 2014 à 23:40, Lixo Aqui a écrit :
> I'm just learning about the flex box module, do you think you can provide an
> example of a solution using flexbox?
>
> Because my fix only works if my first sibling has a fixed height which is not
> always the case so what I want is 1 children t
