Barney Carroll wrote:
That's an interesting approach. Any particular reason(s) not to use HTML5
at all times?
Yes, but this is not the place to discuss it/them !
Philip Taylor
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
htt
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014, Philip Taylor wrote:
> …HTML 5, but ONLY if new elements such as , or are
> required.
>
That's an interesting approach. Any particular reason not to use HTML5 at
all times?
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
"Validating CSS : When ?" --
For me :
a) Whenever something does not behave as anticipated;
b) Before signing anything off as complete.
If it fails at either stage, then ensure that any deviations from the
specification are (a) intentional, (b) essential, and (c) have no
undesirable or unant
>
> I only run stylesheets through the validator when: 1) I can not find one
> of my own "disable this declaration" markers, 2) I can not manage to debug
> a problem in browsers locally, and/or 3) I have to share my CSS code with a
> developer who is paranoid when it comes to validity -- something
Den 25.11.2014 10:50, skrev MiB:
As I often feel inclined to use vendor-prefixes in order to meet business
requirements, my CSS typically don’t validate fully. I always know why and
using SASS have shielded me somewhat from seeing this issue, as I can postpone
any prefixes to the final phase.
A task runner like Gulp would be useful for this kind of thing. This guy
wrote an excellent introduction (and starter kit) [0] that covers automated
SASS & Browserify code compilation and filesystem-browser synchronisation.
I've used Gulp for my last 2 major project for all my development and buil
As I often feel inclined to use vendor-prefixes in order to meet business
requirements, my CSS typically don’t validate fully. I always know why and
using SASS have shielded me somewhat from seeing this issue, as I can postpone
any prefixes to the final phase. Are you developers handling this d
nov 25 2014 07:38 Karl DeSaulniers :
> In regards to what you asked here, If they are using these plugins and
> actually fixing any errors they find, then yes I know (without pretension)
> their code will be valid. It's the reason these plugins were created. lol
So your inference here is that
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Crest Christopher
wrote:
> I have a question, ...trimmed]
>
Put the markup and css of the page in question on a public server and
provide a link to it in your post to the list.
Best,
David Laakso
--
Chelsea Creek Studio
http://ccstudi.com
desktop | laptop | tablet
I have a question, how do I eliminate the white space between the orange
box and the red box, I've tried or so I believe I tried nearly
everything and it won't disappear ?
At first I thought it was padding or margins, so I set either and
both red and orange box to {margin-top/bottom:padding:
On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 7:32:58 AM Philip Taylor wrote:
>
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> > Discuss. On webdesign-l. Or off list. As Tim said, this isn't CSS.
>
> Nonsense. Media queries are a part of the CSS infrastructure, and they
> were the subject of my message. And their use (or abuse) certai
Tom Livingston wrote:
Discuss. On webdesign-l. Or off list. As Tim said, this isn't CSS.
Nonsense. Media queries are a part of the CSS infrastructure, and they
were the subject of my message. And their use (or abuse) certainly
requires discussion here if Christopher is not to waste month
Discuss. On webdesign-l. Or off list. As Tim said, this isn't CSS.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:20 AM Philip Taylor wrote:
>
>
> Tim Arnold wrote:
>
> > Though this discussion is interesting (as it is every 6 months when it
> > comes back again) it isn't really on the topic of CSS. Any other
> > tho
Tim Arnold wrote:
Though this discussion is interesting (as it is every 6 months when it
comes back again) it isn't really on the topic of CSS. Any other
thoughts for Christopher about media queries?
Media queries are an attempt to pigeon-hole browser geometries into
discrete sets. As the
Though this discussion is interesting (as it is every 6 months when it
comes back again) it isn't really on the topic of CSS. Any other thoughts
for Christopher about media queries?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014, 6:58 AM Philip Taylor wrote:
> I don't seek to excuse such an error for one second, but ther
I don't seek to excuse such an error for one second, but there is an
important difference between the two : the Wordpress site is written
in XHTML 1.0 Transitional, a stable specification against which the
Validator can check pages accurately; the W3C site, on the other hand,
is written in HTML
16 matches
Mail list logo
