Re: [css-d] Wrong Selector?

2015-10-12 Thread Ryan Reese
You can be assured that Bootstrap covers every browser that you need to be concerning yourself with :-). On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Theophan Dort wrote: > Many thanks to you both! > > It’s been a long while since I’ve dealt with HTML and CSS, and HTML 5 is > new to me, as is the Bootstrap

Re: [css-d] Wrong Selector?

2015-10-12 Thread Theophan Dort
Many thanks to you both! It’s been a long while since I’ve dealt with HTML and CSS, and HTML 5 is new to me, as is the Bootstrap thing (though I like it a lot), and I’m almost wholly unfamiliar with CSS 3. I’m a cautious somewhat elderly guy, and I’m more than a little nervous about whether th

Re: [css-d] Wrong Selector?

2015-10-12 Thread Ryan Reese
Yes, the only thing that can override !important is another !important. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: > That rule would then become *extremely* hard to over-ride should the > need arise. IIRC, even an inline style would get trumped by this rule. > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015

Re: [css-d] Multiple background image dilemma

2015-10-12 Thread Crest Christopher
I solved it, I had to use percentages instead of a combo of cover,x%, something at 2:30am I wasn't able to realize :) Karl DeSaulniers wrote: On Oct 11, 2015, at 10:23 PM, Crest Christopher wrote: I have an issue whereas I'm using multiple background images, turning off background-cover

Re: [css-d] Wrong Selector?

2015-10-12 Thread Tom Livingston
That rule would then become *extremely* hard to over-ride should the need arise. IIRC, even an inline style would get trumped by this rule. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Theophan Dort wrote: > Many thanks! > > I tried “.navbar a” and it didn’t work, but it worked when I added > "!important",

Re: [css-d] Multiple background image dilemma

2015-10-12 Thread Crest Christopher
This is for mobile (iPhone) at portrait, with background-cover:off, all is fine, when I change to landscape the first, of two background images doesn't cover, but the second background image is no longer stretched, which is what I want, but I also want my first background image to cover. Karl

Re: [css-d] Wrong Selector?

2015-10-12 Thread Theophan Dort
Many thanks! I tried “.navbar a” and it didn’t work, but it worked when I added "!important", so I figured there must be Bootstrap rules that are a lot more specific so they’re being used. So I removed the “!important” and tried “.navbar ul.navbar-nav li a” and that seemed to work for most of

Re: [css-d] Wrong Selector?

2015-10-12 Thread Ryan Reese
You need to add the color:#FFF to your anchor rules. It's using #777 from your other styles. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Theophan Dort wrote: > I’m trying to build a very small web site for my church’s capital > campaign, using Bootstrap, and I can’t change the color of the font in the > he

[css-d] Wrong Selector?

2015-10-12 Thread Theophan Dort
I’m trying to build a very small web site for my church’s capital campaign, using Bootstrap, and I can’t change the color of the font in the header. I put a style in the section that changes the background color fine, but the same selector doesn’t change the font color: .navbar {

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

2015-10-12 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
On the first message from either person. Jeff Gates: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Philip: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On

Re: [css-d] Multiple background image dilemma

2015-10-12 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
On Oct 11, 2015, at 10:23 PM, Crest Christopher wrote: > I have an issue whereas I'm using multiple background images, turning off > background-cover fixes the title issue with one of the background images, but > when the orientation of the screen changes to lets say, landscape, the second >

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

2015-10-12 Thread Philip Taylor
Chris, could you please forward (to the list) the message headers in the message from me which you believe was in Korean encoding, as I did with your message ? What you "quoted" was sent (by you) in Korean encoding (euc-kr) so it mis-represented what I had sent which was sent in utf-8 as with all

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

2015-10-12 Thread Chris Williams
As I noted and quoted, YOUR email had the Korean encoding markers before I even entered the conversation. On 10/11/15, 11:56 PM, "Philip Taylor" wrote: > > >Chris Williams wrote: > >> Philip's second reply in this thread has the same markers. I hadn't >>even >> entered into the conversation yet