Re: [css-d] Boostrap menu

Wrap your logo in a div and give it a col or row class? Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Apr 14, 2016, at 5:09 PM, Russ Peters wrote: > Is it good practice to include an image for a logo inside of a bootstrap 3 > navbar? The problem

[css-d] Boostrap menu

Is it good practice to include an image for a logo inside of a bootstrap 3 navbar? The problem I'm having is that the logo is higher than the menu and my menu items are aligning vertically at the top which looks funny. (this is on our intranet so I can't send a link). I've tried to google

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

This is what I thought, though I have not added the width and height attributes in a long time. My experience however is that adding the attributes will impact use of various rwd methods such as responsive images using the picture element. No? On Thursday, April 14, 2016, Karl DeSaulniers

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

So this is saying that a css class can override a hardcoded width or height? Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Apr 14, 2016, at 4:36 PM, Nick Fitzsimons wrote: > >> On 14 Apr 2016, at 22:03:21, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

Hi Peter, I meant.. with "style" is inline css "width=" is hard coded as apposed to and external css .dog { width:100%; height:auto; } I thought you were saying .dog would overrule the inline style. My misunderstanding. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

> On 14 Apr 2016, at 22:03:21, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > I don't believe this is correct. Widths and heights hard coded or inline > trump external. > Unless I missed something along the way. (: )) > > Best, > > Karl DeSaulniers As specified in CSS2.1 (and not since

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

Hi Karl, I'm not sure what you mean by 'hard coded or inline'. Make a test page and place an image: The image will fill 100% of its container's width. It makes no difference if the css is inline, in the head or in an external sheet. Best regards, Peter - > On 14 Apr 2016, at 23:03,

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

I don't believe this is correct. Widths and heights hard coded or inline trump external. Unless I missed something along the way. (: )) Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Apr 14, 2016, at 2:24 PM, "Peter H." wrote: > If you specify any img

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

If you specify any img width in the css then the html widths will have no effect. But beware that if you haven't specified any heights, then the html 'height' may cause havoc with your layout. In the css, even height:auto; is sufficient to overide the html. Maybe 508 compliance requires

[css-d] 508 compliance

List, Somewhat CSS related, I have a question about image dimensions. After checking a 508 compliance check, one thing flagged was not having width and height for images hard coded in the html. For responsive purposes, I thought it was best not to code your dimensions in the html and let