List,
Somewhat CSS related, I have a question about image dimensions. After
checking a 508 compliance check, one thing flagged was not having
width and height for images hard coded in the html. For responsive
purposes, I thought it was best not to code your dimensions in the
html and let css/resp
If you specify any img width in the css then the html widths will have no
effect. But beware that if you haven't specified any heights, then the html
'height' may cause havoc with your layout. In the css, even height:auto; is
sufficient to overide the html.
Maybe 508 compliance requires image
I don't believe this is correct. Widths and heights hard coded or inline trump
external.
Unless I missed something along the way. (: ))
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Apr 14, 2016, at 2:24 PM, "Peter H." wrote:
> If you specify any img width in the css then
Hi Karl, I'm not sure what you mean by 'hard coded or inline'.
Make a test page and place an image:
The image will fill 100% of its container's width. It makes no difference if
the css is inline, in the head or in an external sheet.
Best regards, Peter
-
> On 14 Apr 2016, at 23:03, Kar
> On 14 Apr 2016, at 22:03:21, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
>
> I don't believe this is correct. Widths and heights hard coded or inline
> trump external.
> Unless I missed something along the way. (: ))
>
> Best,
>
> Karl DeSaulniers
As specified in CSS2.1 (and not since changed by any later ve
Hi Peter,
I meant..
with
"style" is inline css
"width=" is hard coded
as apposed to and external css
.dog {
width:100%;
height:auto;
}
I thought you were saying .dog would overrule the inline style.
My misunderstanding.
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On A
So this is saying that a css class can override a hardcoded width or height?
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Apr 14, 2016, at 4:36 PM, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
>
>> On 14 Apr 2016, at 22:03:21, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
>>
>> I don't believe this is correct. Wid
This is what I thought, though I have not added the width and height
attributes in a long time. My experience however is that adding the
attributes will impact use of various rwd methods such as responsive images
using the picture element. No?
On Thursday, April 14, 2016, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Is it good practice to include an image for a logo inside of a bootstrap 3
navbar? The problem I'm having is that the logo is higher than the menu and my
menu items are aligning vertically at the top which looks funny. (this is on
our intranet so I can't send a link). I've tried to google how
Wrap your logo in a div and give it a col or row class?
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Apr 14, 2016, at 5:09 PM, Russ Peters wrote:
> Is it good practice to include an image for a logo inside of a bootstrap 3
> navbar? The problem I'm having is that the logo
10 matches
Mail list logo