>Sounds like you want to replace a perfectly good browser-feature with
>something that's doesn't work half as well, but that's not my problem.
So, in the new CSS era, using is not considered a misuse of
presentation tag inside HTML? (If so, I'll just keep consientiously using
.)
Thanks,
Chris
>(1) what about the problem recommends as a solution in the
first
>place? (not a skeptical question here, just askin'...) And (2), have you
>considered s?
>
>Do you have a demo we could look at?
It's a simple website: http://www.formosagolfclub.com
Basically I don't want the user ever having
>(1) what about the problem recommends as a solution in the first
>place? (not a skeptical question here, just askin'...) And (2), have you
>considered s?
>
>Do you have a demo we could look at?
It's a simple website: http://www.formosagolfclub.com
Basically I don't want the user ever having
Hi,
Is there a recommended way to do in-frame navigation with CSS (replacement
for )? Currently I am implementing that by toggling s between
"display: block" and "display: none". Two annoying things are:
(1) This looks like an ugly hack to me. Objection?
(2) Ideally the menu list should be do
Hi,
I have two s at the top of the page, one for banner, one for links. I
want to have a third at bottom that has its height no more than the
rest of the vertical space, i.e., when the content in the third
overflows vertically, the will show a vertical scrollbar for the user
to access the
It should work in all browsers. As for how it works, you know how if
you have something like:
Foo
Bar
in your HTML, it will render as Foo Bar, and not FooBar? It reduces
multiple spaces, tabs, linebreaks, etc down to one space. IE is doing
that with the linebreak and any indentatio
[snip] There are prettier ways to do it
too, if you're worried about your source looking nice. One way that I use
is:
FooBar
That's neat. Could you advise why this comment trick work, and how widely
does it work across browsers?
Thanks,
Chris
__
>There's nothing ugly at all about making anchors display as blocks.
>Changing an element's display type is no worse than changing its font
>or borders. Remember, (x)HTML is for describing the content, and CSS
>is for presenting it. If it's a link, it should be marked up as a
>link, not as a div
>This is a functionality or content issue and not in the realm of CSS. The
>main problems is how to organize the site maintenance so that changes will
>be made in a coordinated manner.
>
>However, if you use the same markup and the same style sheet, basically
>intending to modify the textual conten
Hi,
I am help maintain a website that needs to support switching between English
and Chinese languages (preferrably just by clicking on a button/link). Does
CSS prescribe a recommended way to do such language switching?
Thanks,
Pai-Hung
___
The modern way to do this, since a menu (even a horizontal one) is
just a list of links, is to use the UL element as the wrapper. The
anchors then go in the LI elements within. See for example the
Listamatic site at http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/
COOL! I am happily switching + inline
I just realized I only need one level of here to achieve what I want.
Chris
> > Whatever reason is the span there for? There's nothing you can do
with
>that
> > construction that you can't do with just the link.
This is for a horizontal navigation bar centered on the top of the page.
> >
>
> > Whatever reason is the span there for? There's nothing you can do with
>that
> > construction that you can't do with just the link.
This is for a horizontal navigation bar centered on the top of the page.
> >
>To add to that, if you want to adjust the vertical alignment within a block
>of
>[...]
> >
> > IE7 shows nothing for the background. What am I missing?
> >
>A link to the problem page for us to look at, perhaps?
This has been resolved -- The CSS is in its own directory and therefore the
image path has to begin with ".." instead.
Thanks,
Chris
__
>I can't seem to be able to style inside to make it centered
>*vertically* inside .
>
>http://www.msn.com"; >Hello
>
>Is there a general CSS solution for this (other than "position:
>relative/absolute") that works on other elements as well?
Some more bits related to this:
(1) I tried setting
Hi,
I can't seem to be able to style inside to make it centered
*vertically* inside .
http://www.msn.com"; >Hello
Is there a general CSS solution for this (other than "position:
relative/absolute") that works on other elements as well?
Thanks,
Chris
_
Hi,
I found that breaking up child elements of with any white space would
cause an extra gap between them in IE7. For example:
http://www.msn.com";
>Hello
http://www.msn.com";
>Hello
http://www.msn.com";
>Hello
If I put the above three 's
Issue with background-image in IE7
>Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 23:13:12 +0200 (EET)
>
>On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Chris Chen wrote:
>
> > (1) It works fine if I specify it via the background HTML attribute.
>- -
> > (2) It doesn't work (shows nothing) if I specify it via the
>ba
Hi,
I can't get it working for practically any elements in IE7:
(1) It works fine if I specify it via the background HTML attribute. For
example:
(2) It doesn't work (shows nothing) if I specify it via the background-image
CSS property. For example:
body
{
background-image: url(/images/
Hi,
I am unable to show a background image for any element in IE7. For example:
(wttcbanner.gif is in the same directory as the HTML file.)
body{background-image: url(wttcbanner.gif);}
IE7 shows nothing for the background. What am I missing?
Thanks,
Chris
__
I see. Thanks for the clarification.
Chris
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:37:03 +0900> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> CC: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org> Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS
> equivalents of "rowspan" / "colspan"> > >
Hi, How do I use CSS to achieve the same results as the "rowspan" and "colspan"
properties in ? I can't seem to find the equivalents in CSS. Are they
supported at all?
By the way, I am using Windows Live Mail Beta as the email client, but I
haven't figured out how to explicitly tell it to send
22 matches
Mail list logo
