Re: [css-d] using id AND class?

2007-04-27 Thread james shannon
It should validate fine; it's a perfectly legal construction. One good reason for using it is to add specificity. div.home might be defined elsewhere, and div#holder.home is far more specific and thus will override it (thought I'd use other methods). Also useful when you have lots of pages an

Re: [css-d] Ahhh! Why can't I find you? Degrading Popup (CSS only?)

2007-01-25 Thread james shannon
I'd imagine Andy meant that IE won't internally be able validate it (because it "sees through" the comments to something that's invalid) -- thus IE will degrade to quirks mode and a lot of other things you had designed under the assumption that IE would be in standards mode will be "off".

[css-d] "one-off" CSS values

2007-01-23 Thread james shannon
Hi... I hope I'm not going to start/rehash an argument, but I'm looking for the best practice for one-off css values. For example, I have a table of data and I want a specific column to be 77px wide. I don't really like the style="width: 77px" inside a , because I'm not separating th

[css-d] s in s

2007-01-05 Thread james shannon
Hi all -- After following this list for the past several weeks, I've been redesigning my current project with a few Good Ideas. One of which is making everything more semantic. I had previously been doing this: Welcome to my site Lorem ipsum dolorem. div.title would be