At 10:45 AM +0100 7/28/06, Alex Robinson wrote:
>This thread will stop now. It has not only had no relevance to the
>reason for this list (the discussion of the practical use of CSS) but
>it has also seen a fair number of people spout off about their own
>particular ideological hobby horses.
At 00:06 +0100 28/7/06, Dave Goodchild wrote:
>Has anyone ever noticed that the Google home page and gmail.com use tables
>for layout, deprecated elements, frames, font tags, body attributes like
>vlink and so on and are invalid xhtml? I am shocked (late night browsing
>with FF web dev toolbar). Ca