Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-22 Thread Alan Gresley
Christopher wrote: Holly Bergevin wrote: I'm sorry, but since the CSS on your updated page is not changed as I suggested, I don't have any further time to re-debug what you've got there. Perhaps you could just try replacing your CSS with mine? Good luck. ~holly I replaced all your CSS

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-22 Thread bruce . somers
And for the sake of the list sanity and etiquette, PLEASE BOTTOM POST!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom_post Can someone please explain what is so great about bottom-posting? I find myself scrolling down through long columns of already familiar content, just to see whether the new

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-22 Thread Kevin Doyle
And for the sake of the list sanity and etiquette, PLEASE BOTTOM POST!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom_post Can someone please explain what is so great about bottom-posting? I find myself scrolling down through long columns of already familiar content, just to see whether the new

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-22 Thread David Laakso
Kevin Doyle wrote: And for the sake of the list sanity and etiquette, PLEASE BOTTOM POST!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom_post Can someone please explain what is so great about bottom-posting? I find myself scrolling down through long columns of already familiar content,

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-22 Thread Bill Brown
David Laakso wrote: Kevin Doyle wrote: And for the sake of the list sanity and etiquette, PLEASE BOTTOM POST!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom_post Can someone please explain what is so great about bottom-posting? Posting to a discussion list is different from normal email

[css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
Could someone tell me why my background graphic as you see on this page http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite6.html http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite6.html does not hug the base of the browser instead it's above it (it's the gradient graphic) it's a style on the {body} Thank You

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
I don't understand. Shouldn't the body style just move the background image to the base how come it's not? Christian Kirchhoff wrote: The div#flashbarelementstwo is positioned absolutely. Therefore it is taken out of the regular boxflow and does not influence the sizes of containing boxes

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread David Hucklesby
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:17:54 -0400, Christopher wrote: Could someone tell me why my background graphic as you see on this page http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite6.html http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite6.html does not hug the base of the browser instead it's above it (it's the

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
If #flashbarelementstwo is causing the extra spacing can that not be removed so that the background image on the body won't have that space? P. Colin Manikoth wrote: It is behaving correctly on 'body' element. The container div#flashbarelementstwo is causing the extra spacing. Why isn't the

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
What methods do I have to resolve it? P. Colin Manikoth wrote: Yes, you can structure your document any way you like. No, there is no quick fix. I was simply answering your question of what was causing it. How you choose to resolve it, is up to you. Best of luck, -colin On 7/21/08

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Holly Bergevin
From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] If #flashbarelementstwo is causing the extra spacing can that not be removed so that the background image on the body won't have that space? http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite6.html If you remove the negative top margins on #topbar and .aboutmeheader,

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
I removed the negative top margin from .aboutmepara and put it to 0 the space is still there. Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] If #flashbarelementstwo is causing the extra spacing can that not be removed so that the background image on the body won't have that

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Holly Bergevin
From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] I removed the negative top margin from .aboutmepara and put it to 0 the space is still there. Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] If #flashbarelementstwo is causing the extra spacing can that not be removed so that the

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] I removed the negative top margin from .aboutmepara and put it to 0 the space is still there. Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
- Original Message - From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 7:58 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body} The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html Holly Bergevin wrote: From

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: - Original Message - From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 7:58 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body} The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Holly Bergevin
From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html Replace your CSS for that page with the following - you don't need the HTML comment in your embedded style sheet. body { margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background:

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html updated Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html Replace your CSS for that page with the following - you don't need the HTML comment in your

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
See what I did and what I need to change, to hopefully fix it by taking a look at the updated page. Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html Replace your CSS for that page with the following

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
I copied from the CSS you did and some if it went all wonky, and the gap was still there. Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html Replace your CSS for that page with the following - you

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
Isn't there one or two settings specifically that is causing this? Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html Replace your CSS for that page with the following - you don't need the HTML

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Holly Bergevin
From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] See what I did and what I need to change, to hopefully fix it by taking a look at the updated page. The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html ~holly wrote: Replace your CSS for that page with the following - [snipped

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] See what I did and what I need to change, to hopefully fix it by taking a look at the updated page. The gap is still there. http://www.walkfar.ca/test/productionsite7.html ~holly wrote: Replace

Re: [css-d] Background graphic on {body}

2008-07-21 Thread Christopher
Christopher wrote: Holly Bergevin wrote: From: Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] See what I did and what I need to change, to hopefully fix it by taking a look at the updated page. The gap is still there.