[css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box

2010-12-16 Thread Gabriele Romanato
During my work I spend a lot of time searching for CSS templates, and I'm always struck by the fact that __all__ the templates I find are non-semantical and with enormous fixed widths... I know that if you want to post something on Theme Forest you have to stick to pixels and divitis but, h

Re: [css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box

2010-12-16 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Gabriele, why does "DOLOR" overlay "power of combining" when I reduce the width of the window ? Is that truly "fluid" ? Philip Taylor Gabriele Romanato wrote: Here's my first, basic test/demo: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/12/css-templates-outside-box.html comments are welcome,

Re: [css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box

2010-12-16 Thread Greg Wilker
ilto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Gabriele Romanato Subject: [css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box During my work I spend a lot of time searching for CSS templates, and I'm always struck by the fact that __all__ the templates I find are non-semantical and with enormous fi

Re: [css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box

2010-12-16 Thread David Laakso
On 12/16/10 5:20 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/12/css-templates-outside-box.html comments are welcome... HTH Test more, for example... 1/ 640 window 2/ 800 window 3/ FF @ minimum font-size 24. 4/ Opera @ minimum font-size 32. 5/ Monitor the character plus sp

Re: [css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box

2010-12-16 Thread Chris F.A. Johnson
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Gabriele Romanato wrote: During my work I spend a lot of time searching for CSS templates, and I'm always struck by the fact that __all__ the templates I find are non-semantical and with enormous fixed widths... I know that if you want to post something on Theme Forest you

Re: [css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box

2010-12-16 Thread G.Sørtun
Object: On 17.12.2010 00:22, Greg Wilker wrote: There are currently a lot of validation errors with the template; both css and xhtml. Source code claim to be "HTML 5", and as such there's nothing wrong with validity, just

Re: [css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box

2010-12-16 Thread Alan Gresley
On 17/12/2010 12:57 PM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Gabriele Romanato wrote: [snip] http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/12/css-templates-outside-box.html comments are welcome, improvements either. criticisms are too easy with me... I'm a psycho workaholic!

Re: [css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box

2010-12-17 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Greg Wilker wrote: I'm interested in responses to this aspect: There are currently a lot of validation errors with the template; both css and xhtml. My personal rule of thumb is to get as close to validation as possible - shooting for perfect. Now and then I question the "strictness" of