Re: [css-d] CSS and PNG - still not KISSING (in IE)

2006-01-01 Thread Ingo Chao
francky wrote: > Ingo Chao wrote: > >> A "degradation without grace" would be appropriate for IE6, I think. > > I think you are right! :-) On the other hand, still lots of people don't > know there are other things to see a webpage: that they call it > 'browsers', and that these other browsers

Re: [css-d] CSS and PNG - still not KISSING (in IE)

2005-12-31 Thread francky
Ingo Chao wrote: >> A "degradation without grace" would be appropriate for IE6, I think. I think you are right! :-) On the other hand, still lots of people don't know there are other things to see a webpage: that they call it 'browsers', and that these other browsers are mostly better. I agree

Re: [css-d] CSS and PNG - still not KISSING (in IE)

2005-12-30 Thread Ingo Chao
Adrian Gould wrote: > Hi Ingo - thanks for that link, proof that it's possible to integrate the > idea. The problem persists though, because while your example shows a > single background image _under_ the s, what I'm proposing is that IE > cope with a BG image being applied to _each_ li. Actu

[css-d] CSS and PNG - still not KISSING (in IE)

2005-12-30 Thread Adrian Gould
Hi Ingo - thanks for that link, proof that it's possible to integrate the idea. The problem persists though, because while your example shows a single background image _under_ the s, what I'm proposing is that IE cope with a BG image being applied to _each_ li. In fact, you can see that I am (suc