Re: [css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

My wife is the main shopper in our house. She has set her browser font site a lot higher than the default. If you want to sell her anything, your site better accommodate her font setting! I haven't changed mine from the default, but I find a lot of sites where I have to kick the font size up 4

Re: [css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, bho...@aol.com wrote: No, that's right, I haven't gotten to the part yet of making the text scalable. I know I'm supposed to, and I've been dragging my feet on this issue for a number of reasons. I completely understand pixels and pixel measurement, but EM's always seem li

Re: [css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

No, that's right, I haven't gotten to the part yet of making the text scalable. I know I'm supposed to, and I've been dragging my feet on this issue for a number of reasons. I completely understand pixels and pixel measurement, but EM's always seem like an unknown, undefined, and unclear e

Re: [css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

On 2013-02-17 22:41 (GMT-0500) bho...@aol.com composed: http://www.sportsmansresource.com/flocalxnewyork_1c.htm >>> Hey thanks. Which browser were you using? Any browser. You don't allow fopr those who use a larger minimum font size. Okay, but that's a whole different issue, no?

Re: [css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

Okay, I think I have my initial problem solved. I needed to add some more html & css to my JavaScript. Bruce In a message dated 2/17/2013 7:51:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, bho...@aol.com writes: Okay, but that's a whole different issue, no? In a message dated 2/17/2013 7:41:08 P.M.

Re: [css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

Okay, but that's a whole different issue, no? In a message dated 2/17/2013 7:41:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, ch...@cfajohnson.com writes: On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, bho...@aol.com wrote: > Hey thanks. Which browser were you using? Any browser. You don't allow fopr those who use a larger

Re: [css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, bho...@aol.com wrote: Hey thanks. Which browser were you using? Any browser. You don't allow fopr those who use a larger minimum font size. In a message dated 2/17/2013 7:28:18 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, ch...@cfajohnson.com writes: On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, bho...@

Re: [css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

Hey thanks. Which browser were you using? In a message dated 2/17/2013 7:28:18 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, ch...@cfajohnson.com writes: On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, bho...@aol.com wrote: > I've been working on rebuilding an old website, and I've encountered a > problem with it on Firefox 18

Re: [css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, bho...@aol.com wrote: I've been working on rebuilding an old website, and I've encountered a problem with it on Firefox 18.0.2.,and I don't know if the problem is my CSS or my JavaScript. With Firefox, the first "Gold Member Listing" and first "Silver Member Listing" appear

[css-d] CSS or JavaScript?

I've been working on rebuilding an old website, and I've encountered a problem with it on Firefox 18.0.2.,and I don't know if the problem is my CSS or my JavaScript. With Firefox, the first "Gold Member Listing" and first "Silver Member Listing" appear heavily indented and cut off on the rig

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

On 30/05/2009, at 3:00 PM, Jenni Beard wrote: > So, now I feel like I have to add a > hack for Chrome The vast majority of the time the only browser that requires special rules and hacks is Internet Explorer. If you find yourself reaching for hacks to make things look consistent in other ma

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Jenny, See: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp HTH, Cor - Original Message - From: "Jenni Beard" To: Cc: Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 4:42 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox >I don't know any IE7 hacks, nor have I

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

On May 30, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Jenni Beard wrote: > Hmm, I've found that often what works in Mozilla does not work in > Opera or > vice-versa, now I just finally broke down and downloaded Chrome, and > all > works great in IE7, Mozilla3, Opera9.64, but the navigation is > skewed to the > left

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Jenni Beard wrote: > I don't know any IE7 hacks, nor have I seen any. Now, IE6, THAT'S another > story! That browser is/was SO annoying. > > Anyone know what % of people are still using IE6 anyway? Last stats I heard > were from almost 2 yrs ago, that claimed almost 25% of internet users... > > T

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tim Snadden Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 8:51 PM To: Css-Discussion Group Subject: Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox On 30/05/2009, at 9:47 AM, Jenni Beard wrote: > Generally these days I code for IE7, then che

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

--Original Message- From: David Laakso [mailto:da...@chelseacreekstudio.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 8:47 PM To: Jenni Beard Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox Jenni Beard wrote: > Generally these days I code for IE7, then check ou

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

On 30/05/2009, at 9:47 AM, Jenni Beard wrote: > Generally these days I code for IE7, then check out Mozilla and > Opera With respect I would suggest a different approach to the line above. If you write standards compliant markup and CSS you will rarely have to make significant changes to mak

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Jenni Beard wrote: > Generally these days I code for IE7, then check out Mozilla and > Opera (and am getting ready to embark on Google Chrome, alas!), then add > hacks where needed since these all seem to render most CSS layouts a bit > differently. > Code to IE/7??? I don't think so. Code

[css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

“then it is also present in Safari (3.2.2). Hacking Firefox 3 is dangerous since particular bugs have been fixed with this version but the hacks are more specific (targeting or filtering) to Gecko engine versions. There is many of them. Anyway how can you hack a fix for this bug?” I’m no expert

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

On May 18, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > Interesting. The hack you have is. > > @-moz-document url-prefix() { > :root>body #login_form label input {margin-top: -1.3em;} > :root>body:not(:nth-child(0)):only-of-type>*|*:not(|*) > #login_form label input { margin-top: 0;} > } As I posted

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Alan Gresley wrote: > This part of the hack, > > |*:not(| > > causes a parsing error. Is this fixed in Firefox 3.5b4? I must admit > that your hackery (possibly combining structural pseudo class support > and parsing errors) is hackier than mine. :-) I'm not surprised :-) However, keep in mind

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > On May 18, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > >> Interesting. The hack you have is. >> >> @-moz-document url-prefix() { >> :root>body #login_form label input {margin-top: -1.3em;} >> :root>body:not(:nth-child(0)):only-of-type>*|*:not(|*) >> #login_form label i

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Alan Gresley wrote: > >> If this is this bug > >> >> > > Although dealing with vertical alignment of floats, our test case isn't > revealing just one bug. > > Reordering the markup is the old sol

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Ido dekkers wrote: > the is the problem > > what i don't understand is why not use the fix? I see no problem with the fix in your case, because of the way it is built up and used. The simplified selector for Gecko 1.9.1 + suggested by Philippe, will actually

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

thank you all for the reply the is the problem what i don't understand is why not use the fix? and if not, what is the correct way to build the HTML ? thanks again Ido On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > On May 2, 2009, at 8:16

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

On May 2, 2009, at 8:16 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > This reduced hack should otherwise work, at least back to Fx 1.5 (not > thoroughly tested)... > > @-moz-document url-prefix() { > :root>body ELEMENT-SELECTOR {/* fix old Gecko */} > :root>body:not(:nth-child(0)):only-of-type>*|*:not(|*) > ELEMEN

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: >>> BTW: which known bug? Just in case there are better options. > >> namely bug 50630: float should be as high as previous line box >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50630 > > That bug is indeed old and well known, and has caused problems all > along. Don't k

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Alan Gresley wrote: > If this is this bug > Although dealing with vertical alignment of floats, our test case isn't revealing just one bug. Reordering the markup is the old solution, and it'll still work - if that's an o

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

>> BTW: which known bug? Just in case there are better options. > namely bug 50630: float should be as high as previous line box > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50630 That bug is indeed old and well known, and has caused problems all along. Don't know of any option but to hack bac

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

On May 2, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: >> is there a css hack for ver 3 and below or something using >> javascript? i need to to fix a known bug only in FF without effecting >> other standard complaint browsers? > > If you really want/need to hack Gecko versions, yes... >

Re: [css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

Ido dekkers wrote: > is there a css hack for ver 3 and below or something using > javascript? i need to to fix a known bug only in FF without effecting > other standard complaint browsers? If you really want/need to hack Gecko versions, yes...

[css-d] css or javascript hacks for firefox

HI is there a css hack for ver 3 and below or something using javascript ? i need to to fix a known bug only in FF without effecting other standard complaint browsers? Thanks Ido __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] htt