Re: [css-d] Chrome vs floated tables

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Bobby Jack wrote: > > --- On Wed, 6/17/09, Richard Grevers wrote: > >> Google chrome (2.0.172.31) appears to >> minimise the width of floated >> tables which have no explicit width, while most other >> browsers assume >> 100%. Is this actually a bug or just one of

Re: [css-d] Chrome vs floated tables

2009/6/17 Bobby Jack : > I've always been led to believe that "float without explicit width" is a > no-no, It's a CSS 2 requirement. Dropped in CSS 2.1. -- David Dorward __ css

Re: [css-d] Chrome vs floated tables

--- On Wed, 6/17/09, Richard Grevers wrote: > Google chrome (2.0.172.31) appears to > minimise the width of floated > tables which have no explicit width, while most other > browsers assume > 100%. Is this actually a bug or just one of those undefined > behaviours > that serve as a lesson to alw

[css-d] Chrome vs floated tables

Google chrome (2.0.172.31) appears to minimise the width of floated tables which have no explicit width, while most other browsers assume 100%. Is this actually a bug or just one of those undefined behaviours that serve as a lesson to always follow Braden's mantra? -- Richard Grevers, New Plymout