Subject: Re: [css-d] EM's, Images, sperling.com, /16? Please advise.
Micky Hulse wrote:
Some of the folks who posted comments in below article/post seem to
think that it is not a good idea to use EM's for layout if dealing
with images, unknowns, and precision is needed:
Georg
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
regards
Georg
WOW! Great info Georg! Many many many thanks for you response. :)
You have really cleared things up for me.
I have yet to do a layout in EM's myself, but I can't wait to find the
right job for such a layout. I was hoping to use EM's for layout at my
Ian Young wrote:
Have a look at Tedd's article on this:
http://sperling.com/examples/zoom/
(Note: Above quote taken from CSS-d email/thread with this Subject line:
Re: [css-d] Can images be dynamically resized proportionally with
minand max sizes?
I did not want to thread-jack.)
Maybe Tedd
Micky Hulse wrote:
The number used was 16. Is that related to default font size for a
particular browser? I thought that number changed depending on
browser... I would love to setup a site that displayed images at the
optimal/default dimensions/resolution, but scaled on zoom.
Seems like
