On 30 Nov 2005, at 6:59 am, Ingo Chao wrote:
> I fear that would require the next nastiness ;)
> Shifting the margin from #contain to a padding of its container, body?
>
> http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/float-containII.html
One problem with this approach: it *requires* IE6 Win to be in quirks
From: "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Float containment problem in IE/Win
> Ingo Chao wrote:
>> http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/float-contain.html
>
> Poor IE6... :-(
> ...and I thought we
From: "Ingo Chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Float containment problem in IE/Win
> Al wrote:
>> if you can get rid of the scrollbar ...
>
> I fear that would require the next nastiness ;)
> Shifting the
Ingo Chao wrote:
> http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/float-contain.html
Poor IE6... :-(
...and I thought we could save its "not very standard mode" this time
around ;-)
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMA
Al wrote:
> if you can get rid of the scrollbar ...
I fear that would require the next nastiness ;)
Shifting the margin from #contain to a padding of its container, body?
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/float-containII.html
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
From: "Ingo Chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Float containment problem in IE/Win
>
> Guess I am a little late in this race, so I had to do dirty tricks.
>
> http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/float-contai
From: "Christian Montoya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CSS-D"
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Float containment problem in IE/Win
> >
>> Although you should remember that expressions don't work if the
>> client has
>
Christian Montoya wrote:
>> Although you should remember that expressions don't work if the
>> client has scripting disabled; ...
> I was waiting for someone to say that. For all the times that we talk
> about not relying on Javascript, expressions should be no exception.
>
>
:-)
You're right
Guess I am a little late in this race, so I had to do dirty tricks.
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/float-contain.html
Two minor changes.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www
>
> Although you should remember that expressions don't work if the client has
> scripting disabled; Christian's hack, though ugly to read, prevents one
> tehcnology being dependant on another for correct operation.
>
> Just my tuppence,
>
> Nick.
I was waiting for someone to say that. For all the
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
> Although you should remember that expressions don't work if the
> client has scripting disabled; Christian's hack, though ugly to read,
> prevents one tehcnology being dependant on another for correct
> operation.
>
> Just my tuppence,
Yes, of course. I usually solve t
> Christian Montoya wrote:
>> Are you guys saying you would prefer a javascript solution + invalid
>> css to my pure css solution, which could be hidden behind conditional
>> comments to eliminate hacks?
>>
>> http://christianmontoya.com/examples/float-contain.html
>
> Nothing wrong with your solu
Christian Montoya wrote:
> Are you guys saying you would prefer a javascript solution + invalid
> css to my pure css solution, which could be hidden behind conditional
> comments to eliminate hacks?
>
> http://christianmontoya.com/examples/float-contain.html
Nothing wrong with your solution, bu
From: "Christian Montoya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CSS-D"
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Float containment problem in IE/Win
> Are you guys saying you would prefer a javascript solution + invalid
> css to my pure css soluti
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> It is the ever expanding trick in IE. The width is not really expanded
> to fit the fixed-width block, only the look of the box.
>
> Expressions...
>
> This should work * html #container
> {width:expression((document.documentElement.clientWidth < 675) ?
> '675px'
Are you guys saying you would prefer a javascript solution + invalid
css to my pure css solution, which could be hidden behind conditional
comments to eliminate hacks?
http://christianmontoya.com/examples/float-contain.html
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliq
From: "Philippe Wittenbergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It is the ever expanding trick in IE. The width is not really
> expanded
> to fit the fixed-width block, only the look of the box.
>
> Expressions...
>
> This should work
> * html #container
> {width:expression((document.documentElement.clientWid
From: "Eric A. Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey all,
>
>I have a problem in IE/Win that's driven me straight up the wall,
> across the ceiling, down the other side, and under the carpet.
> Here's my minimal test case:
>
>http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/tests/float-contain.html
>
> What I'm tr
On 29 Nov 2005, at 10:18 am, Eric A. Meyer wrote:
> http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/tests/float-contain.html
>
> What I'm trying to do here is simulate 'min-width' for the #contain
> div by setting an explicit width of 675px on #topper. And, indeed,
> #contain stops shrinking when it's just wide
My implementation of the border/padding method from the previous link:
http://christianmontoya.com/examples/float-contain.html
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
On 11/28/05, Eric A. Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a problem in IE/Win that's driven me straight up the wall,
> across the ceiling, down the other side, and under the carpet.
> Here's my minimal test case:
>
> http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/tests/float-contain.html
>
Hey all,
I have a problem in IE/Win that's driven me straight up the wall,
across the ceiling, down the other side, and under the carpet.
Here's my minimal test case:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/tests/float-contain.html
What I'm trying to do here is simulate 'min-width' for the #conta
22 matches
Mail list logo
