Michael Adams wrote:
> However, my personal preference is for the @import hack:
> FOR
> * The CSS stays in the css files (doesn't cause you to hack the header)
> * Create code for the standards compliant browsers then hack for IE
> * All IE hacks are in a seperate file
> * It may not need to wo
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:50:22 -0700
Alan Gresley wrote:
> Michael Adams wrote
>
> > I have been lurking here for the last month and have a question
> > about the right way to handle IE using CSS.
> >
> > I use a master CSS file with the format as follows. To me, the
> > master file method as well
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:32:39 -0500
Nancy Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>
> Is @import?
>
> or
>
>
>
> a better way?
>
Conditional comments are by far the safer and generally more preferred
method.
However, my personal preference is for the @import hack:
FOR
* The CSS stays in the css files (does
Please let me apologize for my last message, my webmail time out.
Nancy Johnson wrote:
> I have a question related to the same issue.
>
> I am converting a very poorly constructed table based site to CSS.
>
> It is a tight fixed width site. Since it is a child of a larger site,
> I don't feel I
Nancy Johnson wrote:> I have a question related to the same issue.> > I am
converting a very poorly constructed table based site to CSS.> > It is a tight
fixed width site. Since it is a child of a larger site,> I don't feel I can
convert to a more fluid site or change the look and> feel.> > I ha
I have a question related to the same issue.
I am converting a very poorly constructed table based site to CSS.
It is a tight fixed width site. Since it is a child of a larger site,
I don't feel I can convert to a more fluid site or change the look and
feel.
I have used
/*** IE Fix ***/
* html
Michael Adams wrote
> I have been lurking here for the last month and have a question about
> the right way to handle IE using CSS.
>
> I use a master CSS file with the format as follows. To me, the master
> file method as well as solving the 'old browser' issue, is easier for
> another designer
I have been lurking here for the last month and have a question about
the right way to handle IE using CSS.
I use a master CSS file with the format as follows. To me, the master
file method as well as solving the 'old browser' issue, is easier for
another designer to approach my code.
/* Master C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a more elegant solution to put conditional comments in
> the CSS document itself? Styles for specific browsers could be kept
> in a central location, with the added bonus of being cached on the
> client's machine instead of having to push these comments
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:40:30 +, Bob Easton wrote
(in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
> Go with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone else have an issue with Microsoft's conditional comments
> solution? I really don't want to sound like I'm bashing here, I'm really
> happy that we're getting a more compliant browser from IE, but I'm about to
> embark on hours of work to fix up sites for w
Does anyone else have an issue with Microsoft's conditional comments solution?
I really don't want to sound like I'm bashing here, I'm really happy that we're
getting a more compliant browser from IE, but I'm about to embark on hours of
work to fix up sites for which I or previous developers emp
12 matches
Mail list logo
