Michael Geary wrote:
> > From: Chris Ovenden
> > I think it's disingenuous to call conditional comments
> > "clean, basic HTML". We all want to do beautiful,
> > cross-platform, futureproof page layouts using semantic,
> > accessible markup; unfortunately user agents are currently
> > not quite up
> > From: david
> > CSS is a powerful thing, but it is intended to work with
> > valid HTML (as the W3C CSS validator reports). Clean,
> > basic HTML avoids problems. And conditional comments
> > don't interfere with that at all.
> From: Chris Ovenden
> I think it's disingenuous to call conditiona
On 3/23/07, david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Barney Carroll wrote:
> > david wrote:
> >> Or avoid a bunch of hacks and just use conditional comments to feed IE7
> >> what it needs. I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet!
> >
> > Quite refreshing, innit? I think it's because conditional comme
Barney Carroll wrote:
> david wrote:
>> Or avoid a bunch of hacks and just use conditional comments to feed IE7
>> what it needs. I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet!
>
> Quite refreshing, innit? I think it's because conditional comments
> aren't CSS.
>
> Increasingly I find more people
david wrote:
> Or avoid a bunch of hacks and just use conditional comments to feed IE7
> what it needs. I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet!
Quite refreshing, innit? I think it's because conditional comments
aren't CSS.
Increasingly I find more people find it more important to maintain
Chris Ovenden wrote:
> TO filter the other way you can use something like
> .clearing { display:none } /* IE 6 & 7 */
> *|html .clearing { display:block } /* everything else */
>
> Chris
>
> On 3/22/07, Mark Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The selector I've been using with quite a bit of succ
Alex Robinson wrote:
> ... but the W3 vaildator claims that it's not which looks like a bug in
> the validator to me. Of course, trying to explain that to some clients
> may be tricky.
Pity the one who finds themselves having to justify lack of css validity
and can't... More so if it's actually
Alex Robinson wrote:
> Because while Microsoft fixed * html they introduced another
> parsing bug :)
>
> Actually you don't need the :first-child since *+html shouldn't
> select anything and doesn't in other modern browsers. It's just IE7
> that does it.
>
> The only drawback is that if you want
At 11:34 + 23/3/07, Barney Carroll wrote:
>Wow! I've been under the false supposition that IE7 did not 'believe' in
>the nameless super-html object.
>
>How is it, then, that this works while the simple '* html' selector does
>not?
Because while Microsoft fixed * html they introduced another p
Wow! I've been under the false supposition that IE7 did not 'believe' in
the nameless super-html object.
How is it, then, that this works while the simple '* html' selector does
not?
Regards,
Barney
Mark Story wrote:
> The selector I've been using with quite a bit of success is
>
> *:first-
TO filter the other way you can use something like
.clearing { display:none } /* IE 6 & 7 */
*|html .clearing { display:block } /* everything else */
Chris
On 3/22/07, Mark Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The selector I've been using with quite a bit of success is
>
> *:first-child+html
> so i
The selector I've been using with quite a bit of success is
*:first-child+html
so in your circumstance it would be
*:first-child+html .clearing {
This selector uses the invisible super parent object above html that
only IE has, it then uses CSS2 selectors to target the HTML object
something th
Pelle wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have this in my CSS
> * html .clearing {display:none;}
>
> i NEED this to imp+lement in IE7 too, but NOT in Ffx or so.
> What is the bug code for this?
> In pure .css file cause it is external, no javascript or [if lte IE 7]
> works in this case :(
>
> Regards Pelle
>
Hi all.
I have this in my CSS
* html .clearing {display:none;}
i NEED this to imp+lement in IE7 too, but NOT in Ffx or so.
What is the bug code for this?
In pure .css file cause it is external, no javascript or [if lte IE 7]
works in this case :(
Regards Pelle
_
14 matches
Mail list logo
