[css-d] OT : The Readable Web

2011-05-17 Thread Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Barney Carroll wrote: The Readable Web blog is almost my single point of reference for the latest on font-face. If it's supposed to be The Readable Web, why does it eschew both accepted conventions [1] for indicating the start of a new paragraph, and rely solely on the last line of the

Re: [css-d] OT : The Readable Web

2011-05-17 Thread Barney Carroll
I am not advocating Richard Fink's blog as a shining example of page layout, and can't account for his decisions in typesetting. His technical knowledge of the latest in implementations of CSS font embedding is spot on though, and he can be relied upon to keep readers abreast. I think the name of

Re: [css-d] OT : The Readable Web

2011-05-17 Thread Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Discussion taken off-list. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html

Re: [css-d] OT : The Readable Web

2011-05-17 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
17.5.2011 12:29, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: If it's supposed to be The Readable Web, why does it eschew both accepted conventions [1] for indicating the start of a new paragraph, and rely solely on the last line of the previous paragraph ending short ? Philip Taylor [1]