Erika Meyer wrote:
James Leslie wrote:
I'd like to hear from one of these IT people who have held back our
entire industry, and wasted everyone's money for so much time now.
Exactly how long are you going to leave it before migrating this c...@ppy
IE6-only application you've forced on everyone?
James Leslie wrote:
I'd like to hear from one of these IT people who have held back our
entire industry, and wasted everyone's money for so much time now.
Exactly how long are you going to leave it before migrating this c...@ppy
IE6-only application you've forced on everyone? Another month? A yea
I'd like to hear from one of these IT people who have held back our
entire industry, and wasted everyone's money for so much time now.
Exactly how long are you going to leave it before migrating this c...@ppy
IE6-only application you've forced on everyone? Another month? A year? A
decade? Are you e
But I did not say "let us drop support for IE6". And the page should of
course stay viewable and usable. The market share of IE6 will not sink under
1% soon, and even if, 1% paying users are still a lot, so statistics about
marketshare are currently pointless: you simply cannot ignore IE.
When cli
From: Ingo Chao
When clients are comparing the similarity of user experience, they DO
look at performance issues in IE too, I assume. So what does it costs to
make the page look really equal?
-
I work with major blue-chip companies in the UK, and can say that well
over 90% of our clients would not accept an unsupported IE6. IE6
currently has roughly 20% of the market share of the browser market,
which is around 4-5 times as much as Safari and Opera combined, and only
just shy of Firefox's
