AFAIK, Section's role is implied but if you want to make it specific then you
should be using DIV. For example this code would validate:
This is a section of my page!
Lots of HTML tags will not accept the "role" attribute. Don't know why but it
could be because their meaning is obvi
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Nancy Johnson wrote:
>
> When I first went live with a website a few months ago, the following
> code validated and now it doesn't. Why?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Nancy Johnson
Nancy,
I'm not sure why it validated before, but generally ARIA roles do not
pass va
Nancy Johnson wrote:
> When I first went live with a website a few months ago, the following
> code validated and now it doesn't. Why?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Nancy Johnson
Validation takes place in a context; with no knowledge
of the context in which you used this construct a few
months a
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:12 PM, John D wrote:
> I would change it to:
>
> You are using correct doctype right?
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>> When I first went live with a website a few months ago, the following
>> code validated and now it doesn't. Why?
>>
>>
>>
>
I admit to still being conf
I would change it to:
You are using correct doctype right?
Hope this helps.
> When I first went live with a website a few months ago, the following
> code validated and now it doesn't. Why?
>
>
>
Am 18.04.2013 16:39 schrieb Nancy Johnson:
When I first went live with a website a few months ago, the following
code validated and now it doesn't. Why?
Strange enough: the specs at WHATWG allow "main" as a value of @role in
the section element:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/curren
When I first went live with a website a few months ago, the following
code validated and now it doesn't. Why?
Thank you,
Nancy Johnson
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/c
