Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-02 Thread Pringle, Ron
> > >You have half a dozen top level menu items. That should be > represented > > >as one list with half a dozen list items in it, not as half a dozen > > >lists with only a single item in each. > > > > I'm not sure what your objection is here. Are you saying there are > > rules to using a list?

Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-02 Thread tedd
David: > > And, my code is not nonsense to me -- I understand it. > >That's nice - but I would expect markup to be written for browsers, >not for its own author. :) It must make sense to the browsers, because it works. If it was nonsense, wouldn't the browsers object? And, if your reasoning is

Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-02 Thread David Dorward
On 02/11/05, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And, my code is not nonsense to me -- I understand it. That's nice - but I would expect markup to be written for browsers, not for its own author. :) > >You have half a dozen top level menu items. That should be represented > >as one list with half a

Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-02 Thread tedd
>On 01/11/05, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >Why is each top level item in a list with just one item in it? >> >> To mimic the typical menu layout David Doward wrote: >Layout is the job of CSS, you shouldn't have to write nonsensical >markup to represent that. Well... css is doing the j

Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-02 Thread David Dorward
On 01/11/05, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Why is each top level item in a list with just one item in it? > > To mimic the typical menu layout Layout is the job of CSS, you shouldn't have to write nonsensical markup to represent that. You have half a dozen top level menu items. That should

Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-01 Thread tedd
David: I'll try to answer your questions as I can -- for now: >Why is each top level item in a list with just one item in it? To mimic the typical menu layout you find in applications. You see, in any application you may have, the top menu item is usually a category and, as such, seldom takes

Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-01 Thread Christian Heilmann
> > Good job! One comment/question: have you > > tried/considered keyboard navigation? Would it be > > possible to update the code to accommodate tabbing and > > selection of child sub menus in the drop downs using > > the keyboard? > > I wrote a script to take care of this. It goes only one level

Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-01 Thread Thierry Koblentz
Krassy wrote: > Good job! One comment/question: have you > tried/considered keyboard navigation? Would it be > possible to update the code to accommodate tabbing and > selection of child sub menus in the drop downs using > the keyboard? I wrote a script to take care of this. It goes only one level

Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-01 Thread Krassy
--- tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.sperling.com/examples/menuh/ > --- for how it works, looks, and if it is > technically correct. Hi Tedd, Good job! One comment/question: have you tried/considered keyboard navigation? Would it be possible to update the code to accommodate tabbing a

Re: [css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-01 Thread David Dorward
On 01/11/05, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please review this page -- > http://www.sperling.com/examples/menuh/ In Opera, the drop down menu appears over the preceeding paragraph and not in the gap. It suffers the usual problem of requiring users to have the motor skills to track the menu exa

[css-d] Site Page Check please.

2005-11-01 Thread tedd
Hi gang: Please review this page -- http://www.sperling.com/examples/menuh/ --- for how it works, looks, and if it is technically correct. Thanks in advance for your review, suggestions, or corrections. tedd --