Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-15 Thread Jon Reece
On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Tim Arnold tim.arn...@gmail.com wrote: It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an option to export something like this, but I lean toward probably not. More likely (particularly since it's already happening with Adobe) is that illustrations will

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-15 Thread MiB
15 nov 2013 kl. 15.51 skrev Jon Reece: Not really an illustration app, but Macaw's tagline is Stop writing code. Start drawing it. http://macaw.co/ Ahhh, and you tell us now. This really looks like the real [whatveryourcurrentdevelopmentapp]-killer. At least all of those dreadful

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Tim Arnold
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:15 AM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote: nov 13 2013 06.30 Theresa Jennings: I think they're more proof of concept than anything else. Of course, but what about in three years? Someone will always be going there first. It's possible that graphics apps will

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread COM
On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Tim Arnold tim.arn...@gmail.com wrote: It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an option to export something like this, but I lean toward probably not. More likely (particularly since it's already happening with Adobe) is that illustrations will

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread COM
..it also just dawned on me that illustration converted to code can be dynamically changed… some dizzying implications to that, eh? John __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Theresa Jennings
Yeah, it came up as a 404 for me, and I'm the one who started this thread. Oh, well. It was cool. On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Greg Gamble wrote: http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Greg Gamble
http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? -Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of COM Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:08 AM To: CSS-Discuss Subject: Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS ..it also

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Philip Taylor
Theresa Jennings wrote: Yeah, it came up as a 404 for me, and I'm the one who started this thread. Oh, well. It was cool. On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Greg Gamble wrote: http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Philip Taylor
Philip Taylor wrote: Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github while he seeks legal permission to reproduce the Simpsons characters Translation : the suits and bean-counters have threatened litigation for infringement of copyright. A variant can still be found here :

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread COM
On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote: http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github while he seeks legal permission to reproduce the Simpsons characters Translation : the suits and

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread william drescher
On 11/11/2013 12:33 PM, Theresa Jennings wrote: Deconstruct at your leisure. http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more. someone has WAY too much time on his/her hands. But, it is a masterful display of CSS bill

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread COM
This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? I am very impressed by the samples shown… John __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread MiB
nov 12 19.14 COM: This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? If it's possible someone will make it a part of an illustration software tool. My guess would be not Adobe. I am very impressed by the samples shown… But is

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, MiB wrote: nov 12 19.14 COM: This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? If it's possible someone will make it a part of an illustration software tool. My guess would be not Adobe. I am

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Tim Arnold
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:14 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote: This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? I am very impressed by the samples shown… I think impressing was the main goal. That, and to an an exercise in

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Tom Livingston
Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote: On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, MiB wrote: nov 12 19.14 COM: This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? If it's

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread MiB
12 nov 2013 kl. 22.39 skrev Tim Arnold: I think impressing was the main goal. That, and to an an exercise in what if? So how difficult would it be to implement CSS in a graphics app you think? I'd say it's doable. If it's an attractive feature today I'm not sure. But it could of course

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Alan Gresley
On 13/11/2013 5:14 AM, COM wrote: This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? I am very impressed by the samples shown… John I have used CSS to demonstrate how CSS works or may work. This demos show how 'transform-origin'

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
At first glance I think these animations are totally cool. And then I start to think they're a bit like text blink on steriods. A changing line in the sixth place means real world caution is advised On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan Gresley a...@css-class.com wrote: On 13/11/2013 5:14 AM,

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Theresa Jennings
I think they're more proof of concept than anything else. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies --

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread MiB
nov 13 2013 06.30 Theresa Jennings: I think they're more proof of concept than anything else. Of course, but what about in three years? Someone will always be going there first. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

[css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-11 Thread Theresa Jennings
Deconstruct at your leisure. http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-11 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
On Nov 11, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Theresa Jennings wrote: Deconstruct at your leisure. http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more. __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-11 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
Sent from losPhone On Nov 11, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote: Another one: Apple mouse through history — in CSS: http://codepen.io/joshbader/full/fKjra I need to get out more. Hmm, it is bloody cold outside - I’ll stay by the stove :-(, maybe do a