Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-15 Thread MiB
15 nov 2013 kl. 15.51 skrev Jon Reece: > Not really an illustration app, but Macaw's tagline is "Stop writing code. > Start drawing it." > > http://macaw.co/ Ahhh, and you tell us now. This really looks like the real [whatveryourcurrentdevelopmentapp]-killer. At least all of those dreadful "

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-15 Thread Jon Reece
On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Tim Arnold wrote: > It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an option to > export something like this, but I lean toward "probably not." More > likely (particularly since it's already happening with Adobe) is that > illustrations will export to . Illus

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread COM
On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Philip Taylor wrote: >>> http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? > > Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github while he > seeks legal permission to reproduce the Simpsons characters > > Translation : the suits and bean-counters have t

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Philip Taylor
Philip Taylor wrote: > Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github while he > seeks legal permission to reproduce the Simpsons characters > > Translation : the suits and bean-counters have threatened litigation for > infringement of copyright. A variant can still be found he

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Philip Taylor
Theresa Jennings wrote: > Yeah, it came up as a 404 for me, and I'm the one who started this thread. > Oh, well. It was cool. > > > On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Greg Gamble wrote: > >> http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Greg Gamble
http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? -Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of COM Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:08 AM To: CSS-Discuss Subject: Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS ..it also

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Theresa Jennings
Yeah, it came up as a 404 for me, and I'm the one who started this thread. Oh, well. It was cool. On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Greg Gamble wrote: > http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? > __ css-discuss [css-d@li

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread COM
..it also just dawned on me that illustration converted to code can be dynamically changed… some dizzying implications to that, eh? John __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/cs

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread COM
On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Tim Arnold wrote: > It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an option to > export something like this, but I lean toward "probably not." More > likely (particularly since it's already happening with Adobe) is that > illustrations will export to . Illu

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-13 Thread Tim Arnold
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:15 AM, MiB wrote: > > nov 13 2013 06.30 Theresa Jennings: > >> I think they're more proof of concept than anything else. > > Of course, but what about in three years? Someone will always be going there > first. It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an op

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread MiB
nov 13 2013 06.30 Theresa Jennings: > I think they're more proof of concept than anything else. Of course, but what about in three years? Someone will always be going there first. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Theresa Jennings
I think they're more proof of concept than anything else. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://cs

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
At first glance I think these animations are totally cool. And then I start to think they're a bit like text on steriods. A changing line in the sixth place means "real world caution is advised" On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > On 13/11/2013 5:14 AM, COM wrote: > >> This

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Alan Gresley
On 13/11/2013 5:14 AM, COM wrote: This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? I am very impressed by the samples shown… John I have used CSS to demonstrate how CSS works or may work. This demos show how 'transform-origin' c

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread MiB
12 nov 2013 kl. 22.39 skrev Tim Arnold: > > I think impressing was the main goal. That, and to an an exercise in "what > if?" So how difficult would it be to implement CSS in a graphics app you think? I'd say it's doable. If it's an attractive feature today I'm not sure. But it could of cou

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Tom Livingston
Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > >> On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, MiB wrote: >> >> >> nov 12 19.14 COM: >> >>> This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration >>> tool? >>> Am I missing a concept here? >> If it's po

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Tim Arnold
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:14 PM, COM wrote: > This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration > tool? > Am I missing a concept here? > > I am very impressed by the samples shown… > I think impressing was the main goal. That, and to an an exercise in "what if?" Tim

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, MiB wrote: nov 12 19.14 COM: This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? If it's possible someone will make it a part of an illustration software tool. My guess would be not Adobe. I am v

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread MiB
nov 12 19.14 COM: > This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration > tool? > Am I missing a concept here? If it's possible someone will make it a part of an illustration software tool. My guess would be not Adobe. > > I am very impressed by the samples shown… Bu

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread COM
This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? I am very impressed by the samples shown… John __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.or

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-12 Thread william drescher
On 11/11/2013 12:33 PM, Theresa Jennings wrote: Deconstruct at your leisure. http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more. someone has WAY too much time on his/her hands. But, it is a masterful display of CSS bill

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-11 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
Sent from losPhone > On Nov 11, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > Another one: Apple mouse through history — in CSS: > > http://codepen.io/joshbader/full/fKjra > > >> I need to get out more. > > Hmm, it is bloody cold outside - I’ll stay by the stove :-(, maybe do a > litt

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-11 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
Le 12 nov. 2013 à 02:33, Theresa Jennings a écrit : > Deconstruct at your leisure. > > http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ > > I had no idea CSS could do this. Another one: Apple mouse through history — in CSS: http://codepen.io/joshbader/full/fKjra > I need to get out more. Hmm, it

Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-11 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
On Nov 11, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Theresa Jennings wrote: Deconstruct at your leisure. http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org

[css-d] The Simpsons in CSS

2013-11-11 Thread Theresa Jennings
Deconstruct at your leisure. http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List w