Hello. I am still new to this even though I feel I have been trying a
long time.My website is the only one I have done and I am not sure if I
should separate these into two requests for help, for now here they
are.
Both pages validate CSS2 and html 401 strict, menu left, expanding
gallery
Ken Davies wrote:
Hello. I am still new to this even though I feel I have been trying a
long time.
I hear you and I know exactly what you mean.
Or, do I?
And, if I understand it, you need -- and it is imperative -- to hit
IE/6.0.
Given that goal, would it be in your best interest to
Hello. I am still new to this even though I feel I have been trying a
long time.My website is the only one I have done and I am not sure if I
should separate these into two requests for help, for now here they are.
Both pages validate CSS2 and html 401 strict, menu left, expanding
gallery with
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Ken Davies wrote:
http://www.equestrian-jewelry.com/horse_and_equine_jewelry_for_equestrians.htm
You haven't allowed for viewers with larger font sizes:
FF: http://cfajohnson.com/testing/equestrian.jpg
--
Chris F.A. Johnson, http://cfajohnson.com
Author:
Pro
That would definitely be the Holy Grail...
Stoopid IE.
Let each browser express itself differently, as long as each is
standards compliant and plays well with others. I find, at least so
far, that with the exception of IE6, if I build standardized code that
validates, I can get it to
enough!
--- On Mon, 11/9/09, Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [css-d] The holy grail
To: Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh sandy.pittendr...@gmail.com
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Date: Monday, November 9, 2009, 3:38 AM
The holy grail is that place we'll all be to (soon, I think)
when we can finally stop worrying, thinking about and dealing
with IEsicks.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
David asked me for an example. See this draft, corrections and additions
are appreciated.
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/hgjump.html
Regards,
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ingo Chao wrote:
David asked me for an example. See this draft, corrections and additions
are appreciated.
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/hgjump.html
Regards,
Ingo
Super example. Ingo. It will make life a lot easier for all attempting
Levine's (ALA) version of the Holy Grail [1].
~davidLaakso wrote:
Ingo Chao wrote:
David asked me for an example. See this draft, corrections and additions
are appreciated.
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/hgjump.html
Regards,
Ingo
Super example. Ingo. It will make life a lot easier for all attempting
Levine's (ALA) version of
Erik Visser wrote:
Which makes me wonder: where can i find Georg's spin off version?
Steal one of David's pages and rip it apart :-)
Old, basic examples:
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/moa_1.html
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/moa_2.html
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/moa_3.html
...and a few more...
The issue is similar to a problem already mentioned on css-d [1].
The holy grail's fix
left: 150px; /* RC width */
did never work for me.
The percentage margin bug [2] that is present here can be fixed by:
- omitting percentage margins in IE or
- adding an #innerwrapper with the same
So, I could track down the problem to a single line. Read post below.
Anyone know a fix for this?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Eipper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 09/03/2007 18:59
Subject: Re: [css-d] Holy Grail layout + simple javascript = IE6 problems
To: Peter Hyde-Smith
13 matches
Mail list logo
