On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Georg wrote:
> On 12.07.2012 02:05, Kyle Sessions wrote:
>
>> My instinct would be to declare the non-vendor-prefixed one last, so
>>
> > if/when the browser supports that version of the declaration, it will
> > overwrite the vendor-prefixed version of the declar
On 12.07.2012 02:05, Kyle Sessions wrote:
My instinct would be to declare the non-vendor-prefixed one last, so
> if/when the browser supports that version of the declaration, it will
> overwrite the vendor-prefixed version of the declaration. Does that
> sound right?
Yes. Always the non-prefix
Le 12 juil. 2012 à 09:05, Kyle Sessions a écrit :
> When utilizing CSS3, I know it's generally best to make vendor-prefixed AND
> non-vendor-prefixed declarations, i.e., you should declare -moz-transform,
> -webkit-transform, -o-transform, and -ms-transform, along with just
> transform itself. Is
When utilizing CSS3, I know it's generally best to make vendor-prefixed AND
non-vendor-prefixed declarations, i.e., you should declare -moz-transform,
-webkit-transform, -o-transform, and -ms-transform, along with just
transform itself. Is there a suggested best practice for what order these
declar
