Re: [css-d] Weird behaviour of IE 6.0 (using floated DIVs)

2006-01-09 Thread Mikhail Bozgounov
Well, I tested immediately. Comments DO AFFECT IE 6.0 in a very strange way! Here's the new test case, where all of the comments in the MAIN DIV which are BETWEEN the floated DIVs are removed: http://www.rec.bg/en/test-comments-removed.shtml The bug now does not appear now! I read thoroughly the

Re: [css-d] Weird behaviour of IE 6.0 (using floated DIVs)

2006-01-09 Thread David Laakso
Mikhail Bozgounov wrote: >page: http://www.rec.bg/en/test.shtml >css: http://www.rec.bg/css/test.css >Page is valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional. >The problem: in IE after the last news item appears the following: >5] >Which is (as I have just discovered) the repetion of the LAST TWO CHARACTERS >in >

Re: [css-d] Weird behaviour of IE 6.0 (using floated DIVs)

2006-01-09 Thread Pringle, Ron
> OK, here's the case: > (and it is really very weird!) > > page: http://www.rec.bg/en/test.shtml > css: http://www.rec.bg/css/test.css > > Page is valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional. > > The problem: in IE after the last news item appears the following: > > 5] > > Which is (as I have just discove

Re: [css-d] Weird behaviour of IE 6.0 (using floated DIVs)

2006-01-09 Thread Eric Shepherd
> WHY WOULD IE 6 COPY THE LAST TWO CHARACTERS in the last DIV on a new line??? I > mean, it's html code, why would the browser REPEAT IT TWICE? My guess is that it is the comments that you have after the div closes. This happened to me once. I can't tell you WHY ie does this; and it drove me cra

[css-d] Weird behaviour of IE 6.0 (using floated DIVs)

2006-01-09 Thread Mikhail Bozgounov
OK, here's the case: (and it is really very weird!) page: http://www.rec.bg/en/test.shtml css: http://www.rec.bg/css/test.css Page is valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional. The problem: in IE after the last news item appears the following: 5] Which is (as I have just discovered) the repetion of the LA