Re: [css-d] css validation help

Alan Gresley wrote: > > I > have been influenced by Georg and his masterpiece. > > http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_02_01.html > > > > Indeed. Interesting fellow, Georg: On feeding styles to Redmond... (works for me)

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > Just 2 notes on this: > > On Jul 17, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > >> I would not recommend >> hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in one >> location and thus not easily removed. > > > 1. If your website is larger than 3 p

Re: [css-d] css validation help

david wrote: > Alan Gresley wrote: [...] >> Hello Erik, >> >> This is still hacking HTML for IE7 or lower due to lack of support for >> CSS2.1. My CSS and hacks are *centralized* as oppose to being >> *decentralized* in the HTML. They can be removed in a flash. > > All your conditional comment (

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > Just 2 notes on this: > > On Jul 17, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > > >> I would not recommend >> hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in >> one >> location and thus not easily removed. >> > > > 1. If your website is larg

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Just 2 notes on this: On Jul 17, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > I would not recommend > hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in > one > location and thus not easily removed. 1. If your website is larger than 3 pages and reuses the same stylesheets, I h

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Alan Gresley wrote: > Erik Vorhes wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: >>> The best way is to only hack IE7 or lower since all modern browsers >>> (including IE8) should render a page the same way. I would not recommend >>> hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments si

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Erik Vorhes wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: >> The best way is to only hack IE7 or lower since all modern browsers >> (including IE8) should render a page the same way. I would not recommend >> hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in one >>

Re: [css-d] css validation help

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: > > The best way is to only hack IE7 or lower since all modern browsers > (including IE8) should render a page the same way. I would not recommend > hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in one > location and thus not

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Vincent Pollard wrote: > Hi everybody, > > So my css and xhtml almost validate, except for two things: > > > > 1) The third line here validates in CSS3 but not in CSS2.1 - > > a) does that matter? Erik Vorhes has already stated that it doesn't matter. > b) the overflow-y is the only

Re: [css-d] css validation help

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Vincent Pollard wrote: > > 1)      The third line here validates in CSS3 but not in CSS2.1 - > > a) does that matter? > Not really, since you're doing it intentionally, and you'd run into that issue with anything that's valid in CSS3 but not in CSS2.1. > > I didn'

[css-d] css validation help

Hi everybody, So my css and xhtml almost validate, except for two things: 1) The third line here validates in CSS3 but not in CSS2.1 - a) does that matter? b) the overflow-y is the only way I've found to stop the page jumping around in IE8. Maybe somebody else has a better solution?