Jeff Blaine wrote:
Interesting. I wish I understood why 'overflow: hidden' solves the
problem. I don't like adding things that I don't fully understand.
What overflow am I hiding? Why is 'overflow: hidden' the magic that
states, these children belong to the enclosing div. It just seems
Basic test case: http://www.kickflop.net/div-problem.html
I'm clearly missing something simple here. I want 'bot1',
'bot2', and 'bot3' to be 3 bordered divs INSIDE 'bottomrow'
Any suggestions would be great.
__
css-discuss
Jeff Blaine wrote:
Basic test case: http://www.kickflop.net/div-problem.html
Any suggestions would be great.
#bottomrow { overflow:hidden;/*add to sector*/}
html
wrap the line inside bottomrow div. Notice bot1 bot2 and bot3 are not
inside this bordered box! in an empty division (no
Afternoon all
Jeff Blaine wrote:
Basic test case: http://www.kickflop.net/div-problem.html
Any suggestions would be great.
David L wrote
#bottomrow { overflow:hidden;/*add to sector*/}
html
wrap the line inside bottomrow div. Notice bot1 bot2 and bot3 are not
inside this
Interesting. I wish I understood why 'overflow: hidden'
solves the problem. I don't like adding things that I
don't fully understand. What overflow am I hiding? Why
is 'overflow: hidden' the magic that states, these
children belong to the enclosing div. It just seems
awful obtuse to me.
On Apr 29, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
Interesting. I wish I understood why 'overflow: hidden'
solves the problem. I don't like adding things that I
don't fully understand. What overflow am I hiding? Why
is 'overflow: hidden' the magic that states, these
children belong to the
Jeff Blaine wrote:
Basic test case: http://www.kickflop.net/div-problem.html
I'm clearly missing something simple here. I want 'bot1',
'bot2', and 'bot3' to be 3 bordered divs INSIDE 'bottomrow'
Any suggestions would be great.
Children in hand are always welcome (regardless of their
