rhetoric value=2 cents
Am I missing something here? Many posters to this list (and I'm not
implying that Zoe is one of them) seem to get rather upset when floats
drop in narrow windows, and I simply don't get that. The fact that
floats can drop when there's not enough room to do justice to several
Richard Grevers wrote:
rhetoric value=2 cents
[...]
The fact that floats can drop when there's not enough room to do
justice to several columns is a primary reason to use floats - its
why they are better than tables.
[...]
/rhetoric
I agree (strangely enough :-) ).
The problem is that
Richard Grevers wrote:
rhetoric value=2 cents
Am I missing something here? Many posters to this list (and I'm not
implying that Zoe is one of them) seem to get rather upset when floats
drop in narrow windows, and I simply don't get that. The fact that
floats can drop when there's not enough
~davidLaakso wrote:
Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I have moved leftcolumn into the bottom of contentwrapper, but the
source-order is otherwise the same and nothing is added or
subtracted...
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/Zoe/test_2882.html
...so, maybe it'll do.
It
Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote:
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I have moved leftcolumn into the bottom of contentwrapper, but the
source-order is otherwise the same and nothing is added or
subtracted...
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I have moved leftcolumn into the bottom of contentwrapper, but the
source-order is otherwise the same and nothing is added or subtracted...
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/Zoe/test_2882.html
...so, maybe it'll do.
It is possible to turn this into a robust 3 column with
Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote:
http://www.pixelsurge.com/experiment/negative_margins_4.html
Seems to work fine in FF 2, IE 7, IE 6, and Opera 9. Am I missing
something?
Not really, apart from my wish for _some_ table-like robustness. David
pointed out one weakness (in his usual disorderly manner
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
...
For the large image (applies to IE6 on narrow windows) I wrap the
image in a box:
.img {margin:0 -200px 0 0; position:relative; height:0;}
/* right margin equivalent to size of sidebar */
Very nice and handy. A wrapper that prevents the column wrapper from
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote:
Speaking of being proven wrong ;-), Georg, do you have an index on
your site indicating what each of your layout pages is demonstrating?
Have I done something wrong..? :-)
No, you're just much, much smarter in CSS than I am, so
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I have moved leftcolumn into the bottom of contentwrapper, but the
source-order is otherwise the same and nothing is added or
subtracted...
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/Zoe/test_2882.html
...so, maybe
I've been playing around with various negative margin layout techniques
this afternoon, not because I don't like the one I typically use but
because I like to see what else is out there every once in a while. I
found a negative margin technique that differed from both my method and
the famous
Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote:
Speaking of being proven wrong ;-), Georg, do you have an index on
your site indicating what each of your layout pages is demonstrating?
Have I done something wrong..? :-)
No, I have no index for those demo/test pages. That's my public
playground and I thought each
Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote:
http://www.pixelsurge.com/experiment/negative_margins_3-dd.html
What I'm interested in, then, is not why it happens but if there is
any way to stop it (short of using overflow: hidden, which obviously
works but kills the needed scrollbars).
Ok. Scrollbars intact,
Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote:
http://www.pixelsurge.com/experiment/negative_margins_3-dd.html
What I'm interested in, then, is not why it happens but if there is
any way to stop it (short of using overflow: hidden, which
obviously works but kills the needed scrollbars).
One more, with
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I have moved leftcolumn into the bottom of contentwrapper, but the
source-order is otherwise the same and nothing is added or
subtracted...
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/Zoe/test_2882.html
...so, maybe it'll do.
How is IE7 doing,
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/Zoe/test_2882.html
How is IE7 doing, btw? (I really dislike blind hacking.)
regards
Georg
Doing fine in a 620 window at text-size largest xp :: ie/7.0.
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
16 matches
Mail list logo
