Re: [css-d] star hack /tan hack or what ? a question...

Glen Barber wrote: > I wish I knew about this hack earlier in the week. ;) > > However, I notice you both specify 'width:' declarations. Does this > hack work with 'height:' as well? Sure. IE5 - 7 "eats" most non-valid character you can think of in front of any property-name...

Re: [css-d] star hack /tan hack or what ? a question...

> > > FWIW - you can also target IE 5 - 6 and leave IE 7 alone by using an > underscore instead of a star. > > I wish I knew about this hack earlier in the week. ;) However, I notice you both specify 'width:' declarations. Does this hack work with 'height:' as well? -- Glen Barber http://www.d

Re: [css-d] star hack /tan hack or what ? a question...

On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:32:54 -0700, corey deep wrote: > Hello, > > I have used hack for ie6 : > > div.someclass { > width: 300px; > * width: 320px; > } > > which is it is different than the standard star selector hack, i.e. > > * html div.someclass { > width: 320px; > } > > > what is the first exam

[css-d] star hack /tan hack or what ? a question...

Hello, I have used hack for ie6 : div.someclass { width: 300px; * width: 320px; } which is it is different than the standard star selector hack, i.e. * html div.someclass { width: 320px; } what is the first example called ? is it an improper interpretation of the star selector hack. I wan