[css-d] weird firefox bug?

2011-12-22 Thread Chris Kavinsky
A client just pointed something out to me on their site, and after an hour of messing with it, I figured out what was causing it. Basically, if you have a list item (same issue with both ol and ul lists) that is hyperlinked and also has a strong tag applied to it, and if the list item extends to a

Re: [css-d] weird firefox bug?

2011-12-22 Thread david
Chris Kavinsky wrote: A client just pointed something out to me on their site, and after an hour of messing with it, I figured out what was causing it. Basically, if you have a list item (same issue with both ol and ul lists) that is hyperlinked and also has a strong tag applied to it, and if

Re: [css-d] weird firefox bug?

2011-12-22 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:11 PM, Chris Kavinsky wrote: Basically, if you have a list item (same issue with both ol and ul lists) that is hyperlinked and also has a strong tag applied to it, and if the list item extends to a second line, Firefox will drop the marker for that list item. It seems

Re: [css-d] weird firefox bug?

2011-12-22 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: As david notes, a link to the offending page or even better, a minimal test page, would be helpful. The best I could come up with, based on your description, is this: http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/ck-20111222.html (which, of course,

Re: [css-d] weird firefox bug?

2011-12-22 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Dec 23, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: Chris send me a link to the offending page off-list. minimal: http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/ck-20111223.html The problem is caused by 'vertical-align: top' in the reset block. (toggle it on/off in Firebug). Now the Big Question:

Re: [css-d] Weird Firefox bug in a href

2006-06-20 Thread Carl Youngblood
Doesn't work. The moment I remove display:table, whether or not I have width: 100%, the border and background image disappear. On 6/19/06, Els [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yup, use option number 2: add a set width to #container: width:100%;

Re: [css-d] Weird Firefox bug in a href

2006-06-20 Thread Els
Carl Youngblood wrote: Doesn't work. The moment I remove display:table, whether or not I have width: 100%, the border and background image disappear. Ehm.. option 2 was meant to be used without option 1, not in addition to it. IOW: leave display:table in place, but add width:100%. -- Els

[css-d] Weird Firefox bug in a href

2006-06-19 Thread Carl Youngblood
I'm having a strange problem where clicking on an ordinary a href link is not loading the page it points to properly in Firefox. Instead, it is just jumbling up the placement of the page but not sending another http request to the server. Please check this out:

Re: [css-d] Weird Firefox bug in a href

2006-06-19 Thread Els
Carl Youngblood wrote: On 6/19/06, Carl Youngblood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having a strange problem where clicking on an ordinary a href link is not loading the page it points to properly in Firefox. Instead, it is just jumbling up the placement of the page but not sending another http

Re: [css-d] Weird Firefox bug in a href

2006-06-19 Thread Carl Youngblood
When I remove the display:table, my pixel borders disappear. Do you have any idea about how I can keep those borders but get rid of the other unwanted properties? I'd like this div to expand as the width of the browser expands. THanks, Carl On 6/19/06, Els [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Carl

Re: [css-d] Weird Firefox bug in a href

2006-06-19 Thread Els
Carl Youngblood wrote: On 6/19/06, Els [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/19/06, Carl Youngblood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://constructioncapitalsource.com/test/sample.html [snip] if you either take off display:table, or add a set width to #container, nothing collapses, When I remove the