Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8

2008-03-12 Thread Nick Fitzsimons
On Tue, March 11, 2008 6:54 pm, Alan Gresley wrote: So anyone who has empty declarations blocks in there style sheets will have to remove them now. Or they could do the obvious thing and report the bug to Microsoft, or vote for it if it's already been reported, and it will undoubtedly be fixed

Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8

2008-03-12 Thread Alan Gresley
Nick Fitzsimons [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, March 11, 2008 6:54 pm, Alan Gresley wrote: So anyone who has empty declarations blocks in there style sheets will have to remove them now. Or they could do the obvious thing and report the bug to Microsoft, or vote for it if it's already been

Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but still slightly broken)

2008-03-11 Thread Thierry Koblentz
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] discuss.org] On Behalf Of Alan Gresley Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 7:50 AM To: Mark Richards Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but still slightly broken

Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8

2008-03-11 Thread Alan Gresley
Thierry, come on, share what you discovered. :-) Hi Alan, I shared the position:relative fix for links, but that one is not my finding. I'm pretty sure this ie8 filter is called the Bruno hack ;) -- Regards, Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com I have notice a few passing bugs. Take

Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but stillslightly broken)

2008-03-11 Thread Bruno Fassino
Thierry Koblentz wrote: I shared the position:relative fix for links, but that one is not my finding. I'm pretty sure this ie8 filter is called the Bruno hack ;) I guess (and hope) this will be a very short-lived filter, so it can remain unnamed :-) (Btw, it was Ingo that mentioned here that

Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but still slightly broken)

2008-03-10 Thread Mark Richards
-Original Message- Why are you suggesting in the first place to pollute your source with different conditional comments on every single page of a site. That seems like to much work and maintenance for me. Is that what you do? Well, the pages of the sites I work on are generated

Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but still slightly broken)

2008-03-10 Thread Alan Gresley
Mark Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why are you suggesting in the first place to pollute your source with different conditional comments on every single page of a site. That seems like to much work and maintenance for me. Is that what you do? Well, the pages of the sites I work on are

Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but still slightly broken)

2008-03-10 Thread Mark Richards
-Original Message- From: Alan Gresley Conditional Comments can be problematic to maintained and some beginners will start adding them to every page. Sometimes if it's not a true CCS rendering issue at all but just incorrect understanding of CSS or invalid CSS and markup. I don't

Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but still slightly broken)

2008-03-08 Thread Alan Gresley
Mark Richards wrote: I'm curious as to why you're targeting various IEs with hacks when conditional comments let you do the same thing? Especially if the hacks are used to import external sheets in the first place, it seems to me it's easier to just use CCs to load browser-specific fix-up