Re: [CTRL] [LIFE-GAZETTE] CI vs. JI IDENTITY

2002-01-06 Thread Party of Citizens
-Caveat Lector- I am not going to argue with you, John KK Knight, as I "suffer fools gladly" in this instance. I have posted a thesis for sound minds and if you should ever take the cure you may be able to reply to it. Out-marriage MUST have been practiced. How could the original Israelites have

Re: [CTRL] [LIFE-GAZETTE] CI vs. JI IDENTITY (fwd)

2002-01-04 Thread Party of Citizens
-Caveat Lector- On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Euphorian wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > > On 4 Jan 02, at 10:12, Party of Citizens wrote: > > > Most Jews today > > are deemed to be of Ashkenazi-Khazar descent. > > If so, what of the "right of return"? It depends on how many points you give under (1) Biologica

Re: [CTRL] [LIFE-GAZETTE] CI vs. JI IDENTITY (fwd)

2002-01-04 Thread Euphorian
-Caveat Lector- On 4 Jan 02, at 10:12, Party of Citizens wrote: > Most Jews today > are deemed to be of Ashkenazi-Khazar descent. If so, what of the "right of return"? A<>E<>R http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange

[CTRL] [LIFE-GAZETTE] CI vs. JI IDENTITY (fwd)

2002-01-04 Thread Party of Citizens
-Caveat Lector- -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:55:54 -0800 (PST) From: Party of Citizens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LIFE-GAZETTE] CI vs. JI IDENTITY In many ways this issue is passe. The world is on the thresh