Aleisha Saba wrote:
>
> Well thank you you spent a lot of time on that and I apprecite it; guess
> I was wrong.
>
> Someone had put that out on he web re no mention of Jew in OT, and I was
> just too tired to look it up - I was hoping to put Bill or June to work.
LOLOL
http://www.ctrl.org/">www.
Israel tribes; also of the posterity
of one of them and its religion; Juda (-h, -s); Jude.
eagle 1
- Original Message -
From: "Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2000 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] [LIFE-GAZETTE] Jesus Christ
Well thank you you spent a lot of time on that and I apprecite it; guess
I was wrong.
Hated to put you to all that work - so I will read it all. By the way,
guess Esther is the one book that does not mention God once; and Obadiah
is the shortest Chapter? And Jesus wept shortest line - little
o
Information - regarding occurrence of th word Jew (and Jews) in the Old
Testament King James Version -
>From post it was stated -
"Not once is the word Jew mentioned in old Testament. Only word that
comes close is "Ewe" and sometimes he letter J was omitted in some
alphabet soups ike the K on
In my best Elvis drawl...Thank you. Thank you vvvery much.
FWP
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Ray Mutzel wrote:
> EXACTLY . . . Your own words, very succinct, VERY apropos . . .
>
> "GET REAL"
>
> -Ray
>
> At Sunday 06/25/2000 13:50-0700, you wrote:
> >On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Ray Mutzel wrote:
> >
> > > At S
EXACTLY . . . Your own words, very succinct, VERY apropos . . .
"GET REAL"
-Ray
At Sunday 06/25/2000 13:50-0700, you wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Ray Mutzel wrote:
>
> > At Sunday 06/25/2000 13:11-0700, you wrote:
> > >The real issue here is which
> > >group is CLOSER TO JACOB/ISRAEL and theref
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Ray Mutzel wrote:
> At Sunday 06/25/2000 13:11-0700, you wrote:
> >The real issue here is which
> >group is CLOSER TO JACOB/ISRAEL and therefore entitled to make a claim
> >under some kind of laws of inheritance?
>
> WHO'S issue is it ???
Oh why should 2 b. Christians ca
At Sunday 06/25/2000 13:11-0700, you wrote:
>The real issue here is which
>group is CLOSER TO JACOB/ISRAEL and therefore entitled to make a claim
>under some kind of laws of inheritance?
WHO'S issue is it ???
Certainly not an issue with two billion Christians in this world.
One need not fois
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Aleisha Saba wrote:
> Dr. Poley: You going to let that wind bag talk to you like that?
Why not? I won the argument. "Suffer fools gladly seeing ye are wise".
I especially apply that to Pope Willie and John Lee the Baptist.
FWP
> Not once is the word Jew mentioned in old T
Dr. Poley: You going to let that wind bag talk to you like that?
Not once is the word Jew mentioned in old Testament. Only word that
comes close is "Ewe" and sometimes he letter J was omitted in some
alphabet soups ike the K once did not exist.
Note difference in bibles. KJV uses Habakkuk,
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 12:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LIFE-GAZETTE] Jesus Christ: Quintessential Jew
If the teachings of Jesus Christ are valid, then He was "Ki
11 matches
Mail list logo
