Re: [CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .

1999-10-24 Thread pmeares
-Caveat Lector- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Caveat Lector- Now let me ask you this, IF one were to NOT have a bank account, but otherwise carried on as per normal, ie; used FRN's, etc. . . would that be sufficient to be "unseen" by the IRS? Usually it might be sufficient, but there is

Re: [CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .

1999-10-23 Thread TenebrousT
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 10/22/99 6:52:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It obviously didn't happen in your case, but when I read Mercier's letter to Armon Condo the countless loose ends and endless contradictions found in all other Tax Protestor theories

Re: [CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .

1999-10-21 Thread TenebrousT
-Caveat Lector- See my comments interspersed below. In a message dated 10/19/99 4:39:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I may be mistaken, but you seem to be getting 'a' point, while missing 'THE' point With a few exceptions, when the IRS terrocrats

Re: [CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .

1999-10-19 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector- MHO, What one must do is that your "defense' should start at arrest and must be brought up before arraignment. Quo Warranto, is your defense, with that declared to the arresting officer and to the judge before arraignment, hopefully in a written statement, but oral is enough at

Re: [CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .

1999-10-19 Thread pmeares
-Caveat Lector- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not offended in the least by your comments here. You have all but agreed with my basic premise, which is amply illustrated by the court cases which are cited in the FAQ, that is that the LAW and the CONSTITUTION do not matter a hill of beans if

[CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .

1999-10-18 Thread pmeares
-Caveat Lector- From: TenebrousT Subject: [CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . . Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 12:16:13 -0700 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg26403.html -Caveat Lector- Here is a list of topics from http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html snip No offense Teo, but Dan Evans is a statist imp

Re: [CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .

1999-10-18 Thread TenebrousT
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 10/18/99 4:42:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No offense Teo, but Dan Evans is a statist imp, and a wanna be shyster -- as anyone who ever subscribed to misc.taxes well knows -- it's saddening to see you post his swill on CTRL.

[CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .

1999-10-16 Thread TenebrousT
-Caveat Lector- Here is a list of topics from http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html You'll see that the issues raised in the Tax Protester FAQ are some of the same ones addressed in this reward notice. You must file a return with the IRS, and the 5th amendment will not save you, since tax

Re: [CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .

1999-10-16 Thread TenebrousT
-Caveat Lector- My apologies to Linda Minor, for incorrectly identifying her (as Linda Miller) in the previous post on this subject. subject. * "The most merciful thing in the