Re: [CTRL] It's about children, not brownie points.

1999-04-27 Thread Don Allen
-Caveat Lector- At 12:10 PM 4/26/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > >Previous thread: The FACTS are still the FACTS. > >Fellow Lollards, >Housewife June has asked if I can document my "claim", and >adds that: "[S]ecurity guards as a rule are worthless in defending >the publi

Re: [CTRL] It's about children, not brownie points.

1999-04-27 Thread nessie
-Caveat Lector- >why COULDN'T a 'housewife' be capable of conducting research into this area, any housewife could do as good -- or, as in your case, as bad -- a job at it as any other amateur... Mae Brussell was a housewife. She was also the premier expert in this field. DECLARATION & DISCLAI

Re: [CTRL] It's about children, not brownie points.

1999-04-27 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld
-Caveat Lector- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentally masturbated thusly: >Those of you who have *carefully* read my contributions to this list, I've been on this list almost from it's inception, and can't seem to place YOU amongst the longtime contributors of good information here... >Housewife June ha

[CTRL] It's about children, not brownie points.

1999-04-26 Thread Tsadowq
-Caveat Lector- Previous thread: The FACTS are still the FACTS. Fellow Lollards, I have ignored the majority of Revcoal's previous blather, but feel the need to address the her following questions that bring unneeded doubt and spawn misinformation. Towards the end of this post are additional