-Caveat Lector-
>
> Edward Britton wrote:
>
> > This would be fine, but how would the government "know" whom to protect
> > inasmuch as there is a significant portion of our population with no
> > political voice.
>
> You actually believe this stuff you say? I don't have a "political voic
-Caveat Lector-
Edward Britton wrote:
> This would be fine, but how would the government "know" whom to protect
> inasmuch as there is a significant portion of our population with no
> political voice.
You actually believe this stuff you say? I don't have a "political voice," but
the cops se
-Caveat Lector-
Michael:
<<>>
This would be fine, but how would the government "know" whom to protect
inasmuch as there is a significant portion of our population with no
political voice. Therefore this governmental attribute you hold so dear
becomes a defense mechanism for the elite. Hence th
-Caveat Lector-
Michael:
>MJ:
>So protection of property should NOT be the function of government?
>What should?
That's easy. According to Social Darwinists, it should be the crushing
protective arm of the parasitic elite. You know, the ones who gripe about
having to pay their share of living
