-Caveat Lector-
Yes where are the constant reporting of poll results? During the 1992 and
1996 election season I think if there was an interval of more than say 2
seconds between the reporting of a new poll (when Clinton was beating
Geroge HW Bush and Bob Dole). What happening this season? Is it
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.keyes2000.org/polls/index.html
Bard
Visit me at:
The Center for Exposing Corruption in the Federal Government
http://www.xld.com/public/center/center.htm
Federal Government defined:
a benefit/subsidy protection racket!
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL
-Caveat Lector-
All:
Is it not possible that polls can be used by *any* political faction in
pursuit of their agenda? If we are to look, as we should, at the origin of
such polls (who funds, takes or publishes them), would it not be safe to
conclude that ALL polls are the propaganda trash of
-Caveat Lector-
Good job Jim. You've taken the time to research the subject and your
conclusions verify what many others are saying, which is, that these Clinton
polls showing him to be very popular are nonsense. After having read
"Votescam" by the Collier brothers (both are now dead) I'm in
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/30/98 12:42:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
After having read
"Votescam" by the Collier brothers (both are now dead)
The book was a bombshell, but I somehow missed the fact that they BOTH are now
dead? Do you have details?
-Caveat Lector-
Hey, Jerry! Polling is a "discipline"??? A discipline in high risk, high
stakes deception maybe -- when practised by the Big 5 TV networks (FOX now
aboard in that elite group). Also, your assertion that "the American
people" "elected" Clinton twice is merely an act of faith on
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/28/98 7:30:19 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you do the math, the percentage of the actual population of the
United States represented in the polls works out to .027%. That
doesn't sound very "representative" to me!
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/28/98 11:53:50 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
routinely garner 75 to 85 percent support.
Even regular polls show a hardcore of one-third of the
public that wants to see Clinton ousted immediately.
Add to that those who don't
-Caveat Lector-
n are you Clinton haters going to stop weaseling about Clinton's
popularity
and face the fact that the voters have elected him twice, think he is
terrific
for the economy and conducts foreign policy much better than his recent
predecessors? All your awkward
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/28/98 4:18:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
When are you Clinton haters going to stop weaseling about Clinton's
popularity
and face the fact that the voters have elected him twice, think he is
terrific
for the economy and conducts
-Caveat Lector-
"A.C. Szul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wager that if we were to ask everyone on this list --about 400 plus-- and
folks on
the other lists (MC, REPUB, RUSH, XPOLT, etc.) you'll find not one person
who has
been "polled" or "interviewed" by Gallup or any of its sister polling
-Caveat Lector-
I wager that if we were to ask everyone on this list --about 400 plus--
and
folks on
the other lists (MC, REPUB, RUSH, XPOLT, etc.) you'll find not one
person
who has
been "polled" or "interviewed" by Gallup or any of its sister polling
organizations.
Hey, Mr.
-Caveat Lector-
What makes me so damn mad about these polls is the first one that came
out that put Klinton up to 72% was from 519 people polled with a 4.5%
error margin and they lead all the people on like they polled everyone
in america.
Michael
Stopforth, Jamie wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
-Caveat Lector-
I wager that if we were to ask everyone on this list --about 400 plus-- and folks on
the other lists (MC, REPUB, RUSH, XPOLT, etc.) you'll find not one person who has
been "polled" or "interviewed" by Gallup or any of its sister polling organizations.
Hey, Mr. Andy Kohut,
14 matches
Mail list logo
