In a message dated 9/8/00 12:53:13 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< All he had to say is that he totally did not agree with my philosopy and
why >>
It isn't philosophy, Crowley was no more involved in "satanism" than Mother
Teresa...hmmm, maybe even LESS!!!
Bill.
http://w
From: "Birds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My claims are not outrageous. You say opinions are different
>than facts. Well nobody in here can state any facts because there
>is no proof of most anything that is said here!!!
And yet you expect to us to blindly accept everything you post, without question
ber 07, 2000 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Reply to June re: Crowley biography
>--- Ynr Chyldz Wyld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Now if you wish to discuss Crowley's involvement in the creation of
>> the modern 'spook' agencies, that is quite
>> an
I was not name calling nor being ignorant. Bill was and it is here in evidence where
he said well this birdie is a dodo. Oh that
is not attacking? He set off the anger. All he had to say is that he totally did not
agree with my philosopy and why. That is
what anyone on this list should be d
From: "Tenorlove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Now if you wish to discuss Crowley's involvement in the creation of
> > the modern 'spook' agencies, that is quite
> > another matter altogether...
>
> I'd like to know more about this, June.
I'd have to find and dig out some long buried books...but from
--- Ynr Chyldz Wyld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now if you wish to discuss Crowley's involvement in the creation of
> the modern 'spook' agencies, that is quite
> another matter altogether...
I'd like to know more about this, June.
Tenorlove
__
