-Caveat Lector-
Nurev, you are either incurably ignorant as to the facts in the above
cases,
or worse, you do not care, or the mountain of evidence proving massive
government malfeasence is inconvenient to your argument so you ignore it.
I'm not doubting government
-Caveat Lector-
Drugs are addictive
Some are and some are not. And those that are, so what? it's none of your
damn business what somebody else does with their own body. In point of
fact, I myself have been a drug addict for nearly forty years and as far
as I can tell it's done me nothing but
-Caveat Lector-
Gavin Phillips wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Caveat Lector-
Gavin Phillips wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Very good. I have been very busy lately and haven't had much time to
read
the
hundreds of posts building in my mailbox. Interesting that nurev turns
out
-Caveat Lector-
good critiques of Darwinian evolution.
are not, in and of themselves, a good critique of evolution itself. Like
Freud or Columbus, Darwin and Wallace were on to something big, but were
fairly clueless as to what. Yes, the mind does have definable internal
functions. No, they
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 5/25/99 12:43:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
good critiques of Darwinian evolution.
are not, in and of themselves, a good critique of evolution itself. Like
Freud or Columbus, Darwin and Wallace were on to something big, but
-Caveat Lector-
Gavin Phillips wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Very good. I have been very busy lately and haven't had much time to read
the
hundreds of posts building in my mailbox. Interesting that nurev turns out
to
be a statist.
I'm done with this subject for now in light of a REALLY
