And we come around to
Keel again. Not just opposite, but the enemy of
knowing. This was in the context of his research on the Mothman. He felt
the
beliefs of those seeing whatever they were seeing determined what they
saw.
If they actually saw something which did not exist in their belief
database
Belief is the opposite
of knowing.
For humans, there is no such thing as "knowing."
"Knowing" is an arbitrary absolute. There are, however,
"greater" and "lesser" degrees of
understanding.
You need beliefs,
because not all theories are tested out yet you do not know
everything,
I "need" t
-Caveat Lector-
As Bob Wilson said so eloquently :
Convictions cause Convicts
on 3/5/02 12:04 PM, Dale Stonehouse at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> And we come around to Keel again. Not just opposite, but the enemy of
> knowing. This was in the context of his research on the
-Caveat Lector-
And we come around to Keel again. Not just opposite, but the enemy of
knowing. This was in the context of his research on the Mothman. He felt the
beliefs of those seeing whatever they were seeing determined what they saw.
If they actually saw something which did not exist in thei
Title: Re: [CTRL] test--Mothman
Belief is the opposite of knowing. You need beliefs, because not all theories are tested out yet – you do not know everything, but please – try to keep them separate.
on 3/5/02 11:50 AM, Edward Britton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dale:
test
"Belief i
Dale:
test
"Belief is the enemy."
-- John A. Keel, The Mothman Prophecies
John Keel was wrong: Insisting that others share X belief is "the
enemy." :-)
In religion and politics, there are two kinds of people:
those who wish to control others and those who wish to remain free. The
only mean
