Re: [ctwm] Location of official CTWM source repository?

2013-02-12 Thread Michael O'Donnell
Bingo! With those instructions it was trivial to snag my own local copy of the sources - thanks. Perhaps they could be posted in a slightly more obvious location...? What do we know about the downstream Debian connection and some way to induce them to pull the latest versions? >> Is the offic

Re: [ctwm] Location of official CTWM source repository?

2013-02-12 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 06:36:28PM -0500 I heard the voice of Michael O'Donnell, and lo! it spake thus: > > Is the official CTWM source repository accessible? It doesn't seem to be directly linked, but the first part of still gives good info for

[ctwm] Location of official CTWM source repository?

2013-02-12 Thread Michael O'Donnell
Is the official CTWM source repository accessible? It seems clear that it's not here: http://ctwm.free.lp.se/dist/ If accessible to mere mortals, please mention where... Also, I'd love for the Debian version to get updated - is there a mechanism in place to trigger a pull?

Re: [ctwm] Some diffs I have locally

2013-02-12 Thread Rhialto
On Tue 12 Feb 2013 at 11:37:38 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > Also, I'd much rather have comments in traditional C format (you know, > /* ... */) rather than C++ format (//...). There's a risk of hitting > older C compilers that will break on the // variant. Exactly. Because of this I use them a

Re: [ctwm] Some diffs I have locally

2013-02-12 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20130211225532.gu22...@falu.nl> on Mon, 11 Feb 2013 23:55:32 +0100, Rhialto said: rhialto> Shall I clean up the commented-out code from below and commit, or should rhialto> I not bother? If it's debugging prints, I'd say remove them or surround them with #ifdef DEBUG..#endif. Also