Updating src tree:
P src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi
P src/sys/arch/arm/imx/imx31_intr.h
P src/sys/arch/hpcsh/dev/hd64465/hd64465reg.h
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/devopen.c
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/biosdisk.c
P src/sys/dev/cgd.c
P src/sys/dev/i2c/files.i2c
P
Hi,
Taylor R Campbell writes:
>> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:41:16 +0900
>> From: Ryo ONODERA
>>
>> panic: mutex_vector_enter,518: uninitialized lock (lock=0xd80023501458,
>> from=807c091c)
>> cpu0: Begin traceback...
>> vpanic() at netbsd:vpanic+0x156
>> panic() at
> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:41:16 +0900
> From: Ryo ONODERA
>
> panic: mutex_vector_enter,518: uninitialized lock (lock=0xd80023501458,
> from=807c091c)
> cpu0: Begin traceback...
> vpanic() at netbsd:vpanic+0x156
> panic() at netbsd:panic+0x3c
> lockdebug_wantlock() at
> I'm looking to upgrade my graphics card. What's the newest generation
> that's well supported by NetBSD-current now?
> NVidia "Pascal" (e.g. GTX 1050 Ti)?
> Radeon "Polaris" (e.g. Radeon RX 550)?
> or even something newer?
we have reports that 1030 works well. i still haven't gotten
a newer
> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 12:34:10 +0900
> From: Ryo ONODERA
>
> panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "!(!i915_request_completed(rq))" failed:
> file "/usr/src/sys/external/bsd/drm2/dist/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c", line 475
I committed a change that I think will fix the particular bug leading
to
Hi!
I'm looking to upgrade my graphics card. What's the newest generation
that's well supported by NetBSD-current now?
NVidia "Pascal" (e.g. GTX 1050 Ti)?
Radeon "Polaris" (e.g. Radeon RX 550)?
or even something newer?
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi all,
I've upgraded my amd64 machine to NetBSD-9.99.93 yesterday and I'm experience
serious crashes which were not happening on 9.99.92.
dmesg, https://pastebin.com/8WJeUJDj
Xorg-log, https://pastebin.com/xTAmUZPU
The backtraces from the coredumps aren't really useful,
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 06:58:34PM +0900, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My previous dmesg is confusing.
> Two messages are accidentally concatenated. The former message has no newline.
> They should be splitted as follows.
>
> panic: i915drmkms0: notice: DMC firmware homepage:
>
Hi,
My previous dmesg is confusing.
Two messages are accidentally concatenated. The former message has no newline.
They should be splitted as follows.
panic: i915drmkms0: notice: DMC firmware homepage:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/i915
kernel