PPPoE is a point to point protocol and the public IP addresses
114.23.17.255 and 114.23.164.222 are normal IP addresses. 114.23.164.222
is my local IP address and 114.23.17.255 is my ISP's IP address. Both
can be treated as /32.
AFAICT the important fact is that the route to 114.23.164.222 has
> Beware of possible line wrapping.
No problem :)
> DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs UseMtu
> 114.23.17.255 114.23.164.222 UH -- - pppoe0
> 114.23.164.222 pppoe0 UHl -- - lo0
10/8 10.0
On 31/07/23 02:18, logothesia wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a very simple WG network with only two machines: 10.0.0.1 (NetBSD), and
10.0.0.2 (linux). Indeed they can ping each other just fine, but attempting to
ping 10.0.0.1 from itself yields the following error:
% ping 10.0.0.1
PING 10.0.0.1 (10
> Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 14:56:53 -0400
> From: Brad Spencer
>
> Taylor R Campbell writes:
>
> > Can you please try running with the attached patch and share the
> > warnings it produces? Should give slightly more information.
>
> Caught another one. As far as I know the system is up to date
Taylor R Campbell writes:
> Can you please try running with the attached patch and share the
> warnings it produces? Should give slightly more information.
Caught another one. As far as I know the system is up to date with all
of the requested patches:
[ 19419.647972] WARNING: lwp 16 (system
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 03:18:32PM +0200, Jan-Hinrich Fessel wrote:
> Oh yes:
> build.sh command:./build.sh -U -j 2 -M /usr/obj -O /usr/obj -R
> /usr/src/releasedir.NetBSD-10.99.6-amd64 -D
> /usr/obj/destdir.NetBSD-10.99.6-amd64 -X /usr/xsrc -x -V MKCOMPAT=no release
> install-image
>
> so,
Hi folks,
I have a very simple WG network with only two machines: 10.0.0.1 (NetBSD), and
10.0.0.2 (linux). Indeed they can ping each other just fine, but attempting to
ping 10.0.0.1 from itself yields the following error:
% ping 10.0.0.1
PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No ro
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 10:05:15AM +0200, Jan-Hinrich Fessel wrote:
> Hej there,
>
> tried that on several fresh installations now with src grabbed via cvs
> checkout. No one else seeing this?
> I am somewhat lost in how to fix this apart from modifying the source list
> (md.amd64 that would be
Hej there,
tried that on several fresh installations now with src grabbed via cvs
checkout. No one else seeing this?
I am somewhat lost in how to fix this apart from modifying the source list
(md.amd64 that would be)
because i see there:
grep openssl lists/base/md.amd64
./usr/lib/i386/openssl
