On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:31:48PM +0200, Adam wrote:
> While cross-buidling NetBSD-current on macOS with clang, I end up with:
>
> /dist/src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/libcpp/lex.cc:1168:8: warning: scoped
> enumerations are a C++11 extension [-Wc++11-extensions]
> enum class kind {
>^
> [
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 07:56:02PM +0200, Christoph Badura wrote:
> Yesterday I tried booting an amd64 install iso from sources updated
> around 16:00 UTC under virtualbox 6.0.6. The kernel paniced with
> panic: audio_indexof_format: cannot find matched format
Christos, hanks for fi
Yesterday I tried booting an amd64 install iso from sources updated
around 16:00 UTC under virtualbox 6.0.6. The kernel paniced with
panic: audio_indexof_format: cannot find matched format
The VM was configured with 1GB of RAM, 5GB of disk. ICH9 chipset and ICH
AC97 audio. Host is a macbook p
I've tried yesterdays amd64 -current (201903251120Z) on my W500.
When I run startx I get weird gfx behaviour and a GPU HANG and reset.
The last -current I tried was from the end of January 2018 and X worked.
The xorg.conf is the one produced by X --configure.
There's no .xinitrc or similar confi
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 06:19:00AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 2019, at 3:44 AM, Christoph Badura wrote:
> > This is the relevant code in
> > sys/dev/sysmon/sysmon_envsys.c:sysmon_envsys_unregister()
> >
> > TAILQ_FOREACH(edata, &s
Testing yesterday's current on my ThinkPad W500 I get:
wm0: detached
uvm_fault(0xd1e2324a95c0, 0x0, 1) -> e
fatal page fault in supervisor mode
trap type 6 code 0 rip 0x806ca727 cs 0x8 rflags 0x10286 cr2 0x11
ilevel 0 rsp 0x898067a41d90
curlwp 0xd1e265441760 pid 1048.1 lowest
I get an annoying recursive "panic: i82489_icr_wait: busy" when invoking
DDB from the console on my Dell PE1400SC machines. C.f. the console log at
the end.
Would anyone object if I changed the panic to a warning? This panic
triggers only under options DIAGNOSTIC which was enabled in GENERIC
some
If anyone happens to have a BCM5823 or BCM5825 available I'd appreciate
if they could test my changes to the ubsec(3) that add support for AES
acceleration. Tests with older and the 586x cards are also welcome, of
course.
If anyone can do more substantial tests then "openssl speed", e.g. actual
I
