On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 03:00:40PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 01:11:56PM -, Michael van Elst wrote:
> > pr...@welche.eu (Patrick Welche) writes:
> >
> > >In fact, the difference is between "-t" and "-rt":
> >
> > >I deem "-t" output to be correct (and matches what
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 01:11:56PM -, Michael van Elst wrote:
> pr...@welche.eu (Patrick Welche) writes:
>
> >In fact, the difference is between "-t" and "-rt":
>
> >I deem "-t" output to be correct (and matches what I had in /etc/diskpart)
>
>
> The in-kernel disklabel gets the RAW_PART
pr...@welche.eu (Patrick Welche) writes:
>In fact, the difference is between "-t" and "-rt":
>I deem "-t" output to be correct (and matches what I had in /etc/diskpart)
The in-kernel disklabel gets the RAW_PART from by the disk geometry
and if RAW_PART == 3, it gets d_partitions[2] from the
In fact, the difference is between "-t" and "-rt":
$ disklabel -t sd0
perc|Automatically generated label:\
:dt=SCSI:se#512:ns#32:nt#64:sc#2048:nc#2143360:\
:su#4294967295:\
:pa#20971520:oa#264192:ta=4.2BSD:ba#0:fa#0:\
:pb#33554432:ob#21235712:tb=swap:\
With a kernel & userland of 14 April 2024, on amd64, I just did:
# disklabel -rt sd0
perc|Automatically generated label:\
:dt=SCSI:se#512:ns#32:nt#64:sc#2048:nc#2143360:\
:su#4294967295:\
:pa#20971520:oa#264192:ta=4.2BSD:ba#0:fa#0:\
